The MoQ wimple model is based in part on ring theory. Ring theory is based on an unchanging pre-quark particle and anti-particle (who's properties are Planck mass, Planck change, Planck radius and spin, the smallest possible spinning charged black hole)which form necklaces whos properties depend on the environment they are in. Relationships between the rings can be viewed as entanglement, as is the case between pre-quark particles within a ring. Each sees the other as being directly along side, no matter the actual distance between.

The pre-quarks cannot be created or destroyed, and represent either the quantization of space/time, or simply 1 in units of mass, length and charge. If a fully merged pre-quark and its anti-partner are pulled apart, they appear to be created out of nothing, whereas they are actually, in merged form, the equivilant of a zero-mass black hole. The formation of rings starts the measurement of time, because we can only use rings to measure the properties of other rings. The creation and expansion of rings creates space, and our way of using objects to measure distances.

Because no 2 points can occupy the same space at the same time in our universe, we erroneously think of a ring as a circle. But the ends of the circle overlap with each other and are not really connected at all. Therefore what we normally think of as a complete circle or ring, is in fact a loop whos ends are able to be taken apart, thus the circle in space becomes a line in space encompassing 180 degrees.

Because the MoQ wimple model is not really a circle, but is only represented as a circle for purposes of clarification, the lines within the models tedtrahedrons can also come loose. This seems to be the enabling process which allows the layers of the model to interact with each other in only a one-way fashion...a precessional fashion.

The direction of action of mass energy is outwards, the same as motional energy around a point, whilst the action of potential energy is inwards. A tetrahedron is composed of 2 triangles who's ends have come loose, as I have depicted below.

We can assume this indeed happens as it is coherence which holds together the ends of the triangles, and yet not static entanglement, but rather Dynamic, which is unrecognizable. The ends come loose and form loops, combining with other loose ends. Two triangle form a tetrahedron, the basic building block of the MOQ Wimple Model.

The gentle reader will make allowances here for my artwork. It is dreadful, I know, but it is the idea I am trying to convey. If we expand this idea of tetrahedrons within tetrahedrons, into the MOQ Wimple Model itself, we come up with a model that looks like this. I have taken the liberty of depicting Dynamic Quality between the four static levels, and I am unsure if it is an accurate interpretation on my part.

The model may indicate a conception of space, but that is not a correct conception when the model is more closely examined. In fact, there is no-space represented in the model by the yellowness depicting Dynamic Quality. Dynamic Quality could be said to be beyond space/time, yet in an attempt to convey its enormity, its potentiality, I have represented it in a manner consistent with other ways to imagine the unimaginable.

In one of Castenada's books, he tells the story of Don Juan instructing his four apprentices to carry a heavy table deep into a remote valley. The journey took days. Once in the enormous and remote valley, he instructed them to set down the table and sit on it. He told them that the table-top represented the totality of their awareness, and the vastness of the valley represented everything else that did not exist in their awareness.

This is how it is with the MOQ as well. We can represent our static quality in many ways, but the Dynamic Quality has an inherent un-pin-able-down-ness to it, until we get it on that table top and we can deal with pieces of its essence.

Here is a more accurate representation of the MOQ Wimple Model using tetrahedrons, themselves each constructed of triangles. As this model depicts the interaction of Dynamic Quality in a more expansive fashion, it is preferable over the bullseye circle model, but harder to work with as a learning tool. Why bother drawing tetrahedrons when one can simply draw five circles and depict the same idea? That is my reasoning in simplifying the original wimple model to 2-D circles representing 3-D tetrahedrons in real space.

Please use your 'back' button to return to the previous page.