Porphyria Educational Services
PORPHYRIA EDUCATIONAL SERVICES BULLETIN
Vol. 2 No. 5
January 30, 2000
Focus: LATEX ALLERGY
The overall incidence
of latex allergy is unknown, but the
prevalence in the general nonatopic population is estimated to be
less than 1 percent which
was cited in recent study in Michigan.
In this study which
was conducted in the city of Detroit, 1000 blood
donors were tested for immunoglobulin E (IgE) specificity for
latex. The outcome
of the study cited a 6.4 percent positive response, which
seems to be a
much higher prevalence in the general population than had been
indicated earlier.
Latex allergy has had
quite a history. Beginning in the fall of
1989, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) started
receiving medical reports
of patients going into anaphylactic shock while receiving barium
enemas. It was soon found that the latex-cuffed enema
tip was the cause
of a total of 16 deaths.
Increased awareness of
latex allergy followed this episode.
Another gorup of patients at risk are spina bifida patients.
These
patients are frequently exposed to latex from
urethral catheterizations,
multiple surgeries, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement
early in life.
The prevalence of
latex allergy in porphyria patients ranges much
higher. Porphyria patients with cutaneous symptomology or those
with MCS
exacerbation need to be especially aware of the problems with
latex.
The numbers of
latex allergy patients among health care workers
is estimated between 5 to 10 percent.
Workers in the
latex-manufacturing industry are also at risk, with
one glove-manufacturing plant reporting a 3.7 percent prevalence
of occupational
asthma based on positive skin-prick testing and spirometric data.
Workers at
a latex doll-manufacturing plant were also found to be sensitized
to latex
sensitization.
Other persons are at
risk, especially the police and
emergency medical personnel, food handlers who work in cafeterias
and
fast-food restaurants, and sanitation engineers in various fields,
all of
whom can wear latex gloves for prolonged periods.
Patients with atopy
have higher risk for latex allergy.
The reasons for latex
allergy has to do with the processing and
source of latex. Latex is the milky sap obtained by tapping the
rubber
tree. It is derived from the cells of the lactiferous
system found in the
rubber tree. The raw product is mixed with a preservative,
such as
ammonia. It is processed and it concentrated.
Then the latex is shipped
as a latex concentrate.
Numerous chemical
accelerators reduce the temperature and time
required. These accelerators can cause allergic reactions and are
responsible for many
cases of contact dermatitis.
Chemically, latex
contains proteins, cis-polyisoprene, water, and
lipids. The proteins cause the severe immediate hypersensitivity
reactions.
More than 50 different proteins have been implicated in the
allergic
response, with up to a total of 240 different proteins found in
latex. Latex
products are made either by pouring the rubber into molds or by
forming a
coating in a dipped process, as is done with gloves, balloons,
and condoms.
Coated or very
soft rubber products appear to have the highest
content of latex proteins and, therefore, have the greatest
allergenic potential.
Systemic reactions to
latex can result from exposure to latex
protein by various routes, including the skin, mucous membranes,
inhalation, and
intravascular or internal tissue.
Medical devices that
have been reported to trigger serious systemic
reactions by cutaneous exposure include anesthetic masks,
tourniquets,
electrocardiogram electrodes, adhesive tapes, condom catheters,
and
ileostomy bags.
Most severe reactions
to latex have resulted from latex proteins
contacting mucous membranes of the mouth, vagina, urethra, or
rectum. Materials used in dentistry, including gloves, mouth bite
plates,
and orthodontic elastics, are potential allergic sources.
If you are aware of
itching or other allergic reaction to latex
please notify for medical care provider. Please note this
reaction in your medical
records and carry this information in your wallet. Such
reactions are
as important to cite as those of an allergic reaction to
penicillin.