[Dr. Henry Foster, a national figure in health care, was
nominated to be the U. S. Surgeon General on February 2,
1995.]
I commend the committee, and Congressman Conyers, for holding this
briefing today on the "National Public Hospital Safety Net in
Crisis: D. C. General Hospital in Focus." The threatened close
down, or curtailment of functioning of D. C. General Hospital would
be a national tragedy, and parallels similar health disasters
around the country. . I support very strongly the effort to keep
this hospital open as a full service hospital.
I would say, in fact, that we have an obligation to keep this
facility available. When a public service - a crucial service,
such as D. C. General Hospital - cannot be obtained through the
free market society, then there is an obligation for us to provide
that service. That is clear. The implications of closing this
hospital will translate into adverse health care outcomes and,
obviously, in the long run, this will have negative economic
consequences. We have a moral obligation to keep this facility
open - unless, and this is an important point - unless there are
facilities that can meet these needs otherwise. However, from what
I understand, the loss of this hospital as a full service facility
would create a void that would go unfilled. Therefore, as I said,
I strongly support this effort in support of this hospital.
Now, we should also consider this issue from the standpoint of the
national objectives of U.S. health care policy. A major objective
of US Health Care policy has been to close disparities in health
care - this directly relates to the effort of the Center for
Disease Control (CDC), and Health and Human Services (HHS). This
has been the stated national policy. Now closing this hospital
will actually go in the opposite direction of decreasing health
outcome disparities - and therefore, the opposite of stated
national policy. We talk about getting rid of health disparities,
but then consider doing something that is completely negative to
that policy. Closing this hospital is, in fact, a contradiction to
national policy, a mitigation of it - because - it will decrease
access and utilization of critical services.
There is much more I could say on this question, and its
implications for national health care policy in general. However,
I will close my statement here. Again, I think our obligation as
public and health officials is clear. D. C. General Hospital
should remain as a full service facility for the citizens of this
community If anything, the hospital should be expanded and
improved -- as should our national health care systems in general.
We are talking, after all, about life, and about death.
The preceding article is a rough version of
the article that appeared in
The Executive Intelligence Review. It is made available here
with the permission of The
Executive Intelligence Review. Any use of, or quotations from,
this article must attribute them
to The Executive Intelligence Review
Readings from the American Almanac. Contact us at:
american_almanac@yahoo.com.