The enactment of the Energy Policy Act Of 1992 continues to bring
about tremendous change in the national electricity structure. The
deregulation of the country's utilities has prompted public power
entities to offer new, creative ways to help reduce electricity costs.
Public power systems are now forming marketing alliances with other
utilities or swapping power with utilities that have peak demand curves
opposite theirs. For example, Florida's Jacksonville Electric
Authority, Georgia's MEAG Power, and South Carolina's state-owned
Santee Cooper have formed The Energy Authority, which buys and sells
wholesale power for its member organizations. Four municipal utilities
in New England - Braintree Electric Light Connecticut Municipal
Electric Energy Cooperatives Taunton Municipal Light, and Reading
Municipal Light - recently formed a marketing alliance Energy New
England that combines their wholesale brokering efforts.
Elsewhere the Kansas City Kansas, Board of Public Utilities teamed
up with a power marketer to sell excess energy, while Arizona's Salt
River Project is providing surplus winter electricity to a power
marketer in exchange for power during the summer. Also, the Orangeburg,
S.C. Department of Public Utilities signed a new market-based
electricity supply agreement that will reduce its costs by $3.5 million
a year over a four-year period. And 27 Iowa utilities shaved a
collective $6.5 million to $7.7 million off their yearly electric bills
by negotiating a new power supply contract.
Other public power systems are facilitating customer choice in
advance of state regulatory directives. For example, California's
Sacramento Municipal Utility District is phasing in direct access to
some customers and plans to offer a[[ customers that choice by 2002. In
Pasadena, the local public utility will provide customer choice in
2000. The Clark Public Utility District in Ephrata, Wash., will be
offering its largest industrial customers a choice by 1998.
Two other restructuring concepts are important. One is
municipalization, or forming a new public power system, which can buy
power on the cheaper wholesale market. The second is aggregation, in
which a group of energy buyers pool their energy needs in order to make
the group more attractive to sellers of wholesale power and, therefore,
to qualify for lower electric rates. Aggregation can involve groups of
residential customers, small commercial customers, or large energy
users with multiple locations. It lowers the power provider's
transaction costs, making doing business more feasible and profitable,
according to a recent study by Kay Guinane, a former attorney with
Environmental Action.
Industrial energy users are often the driving force behind
municipalization because they are aware that municipal systems are free
to search for the best deal for their customers. Here are some recent
efforts to form new municipal utilities: o Total Petroleum Inc., which
has a refinery in Alma, Mich., began supporting municipalization in
1994 after the area private utility refused to grant it interruptible
rates under conditions acceptable to the company.
* Total Petroleum believes it's been overcharged by $3 million since
1994.
* Littleton, N.H., estimates that it can realize savings of more than
$1 million a year by switching suppliers. For instance, the city has
discovered it can buy power for $0.03 to $0.045, compared with the
$0.64 it now pays.
* In northern New York, 22 towns and villages plan to join forces to
create a public power utility to serve parts of St. Lawrence and
Franklin counties. By going municipal, the towns would save 25 to 40
percent. Each community would form its own municipal system. These
systems would then be combined and operated as one utility. In the
aggregation arena, public power systems are also blazing the trail:
* The Los Angeles Department of Water & Power teamed up with Revelation
Energy Resources to provide power on a wholesale, nationwide basis.
* Dakota City and South Sioux City, Neb., have entered agreements that
will save up to 15 percent on heating bills. The two cities will
aggregate the load of customers and buy natural gas at wholesale rates.
They will then resell it to another utility, which will provide
distribution and billing.
* Seattle City Light inked a deal with Nordstrom's, the upscale Seattle
retailer, to provide power to 38 of its California facilities in 1998.
Earlier, Seattle City Light made a similar arrangement with the
Association of Bay Area Governments, an agency Of 104 local governments
in the San Francisco area.
City Public Service (CPS) of San Antonio offers bill aggregation for
large customers with more than one facility. The city will wheel power
for industrial customers; San Antonio offers levelized billing for
commercial customers and electronic-fund transfers for easy payments.
The CPS web site is located at http://www.ci.sat.tx.us/cps.