This is a distance learning course, concentrating on uses of the Internet for teaching, learning and professional development. It also is intended to give you enough web sites and leads-in to more web sites to be a continuously useful resource for your learning and doing.
Assessment is based on work you produce in series of essays/listings for each Essential Question or topic you "connect with," and with an annotated lists of sites supporting your views and reflecting your web work. Note the Rubric for Course Portfolio Assessment.
For instance, you might write “The site XXXX [http://www.xxx.com] gave me a different perspective on how to help students learn _____. It also cleared up for me something I was confused about, and that is what educators mean by __________.” Certainly you would want to elaborate more.
This work may be emailed to me at ozpk100@aol.com, or snail-mailed to me at Chad C. Osborne 923 W. Mission St., Santa Barbara, CA 93101. If you email the work, you may wish to put it in a Zip file, which compresses text and makes it easier to send over the 'Net.
WELCOME TO ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS in TEACHING and LEARNING--A Distance Learning {"Any time, Any place} Portfolio and Discussion Board Based Course of and about Essential Questions with Web Resources and Assignments. Work on these in any order you like, and feel free to turn any issue into a question and react to it. This course intends to give you many CHOICES of sites and viewpoints, many of them coming from teachers in your field of study.
An underlying assumption for this course is that the current "teaching-to-the-test furor is both based on false ideas [see DEPTH vs. "COVERAGE" in TEACHING and STANDARDIZED TEST PREP] and on little understood historical and political factors behind current schooling and standardized testing [see ARE SCHOOLS INTENTIONALLY DUMBED DOWN?].
Key Course Search Sites: GOOGLE [Highest rated single search engine]
DOGPILE [Top rated multiple search engine].
Try to work at a pace of one good writing for each essential question selected per week. Each Question is seeking YOUR thoughts and opinions, based on the sites on this page. There are no predetermined answers, which is why it is important for you to explain your views. YOU are responsible for keeping up with web work.
[Be sure your "answer" addresses the teacher test, MCAS, and curriculum content and process.]
Part 1: *1*Essay Excerpts by John Gatto suggest a true but little known series of historical contexts for today's testing controversy. Then consider the following:
Advocates of school reform would do well to consider the "Hard Truths" about the deep structure of schooling,Barbara Benham Tye explores in her book by this title (Teachers College Press, 2000). Consistent with the failure of past reform cycles to last beyond a three to five year cycle, and the lack of transfer of successful practices from one context to another, Tye? insights help explain why what can hope to be changed in schools are the ?ersonality factors?oving pieces around within a box. She favors change, but cautions that incremental change is the only kind that schooling can tolerate. The box, the deep structure, is not simply the factory-like structure of school organization, or the persistence of teacher-centered classroom traditions. Tye asserts it is the "conventional wisdom" of unexamined assumptions held in our culture. The ones she enumerates are
1. Schools are chaotic, dangerous places.
2. Teaching is an easy job, with lots of time off.
3. Too much money is spent on schools.
4. Schools today are not doing a good job of teaching the basics.
5. A quiet classroom is one where learning is taking place.
6. The most effective teaching is traditional frontal, and teacher-directed.
7. Children should be grouped by age and ability.
8. Parents should participate in running the schools.
Given these unexamined assumptions, and the influence they have in current society, is it any wonder that we have growing movements in
Homeschooling, and
MCAS testing and the increasing teacher shortage are sure to fuel the continued growth of these movements.
Case in Point 1: The Teacher Test and MCAS Testing.
*1*MCAS: WHY IS THIS BEING DONE TO OUR KIDS?
*1*Helps for MCAS Preparation for Teachers and Students**Check this site out!
Gatto's UNDERGROUND HISTORY OF AMERICAN ECUCATION TOUR
Here is a final section for you to consider thoughtfully in this inquiry. Think about the role of thinking time in your own learning, of privacy and solitude, of these diminishing and essential ingredients of intelligence and intellectual and emotional growth. React to the reading in this inquiry.
Here is the calculus of time the children I teach must deal with:
- Out of the 168 hours in each week, my children sleep 56. That leaves them 112 hours a week out of which to fashion a self.
- My children watch 55 hours of television a week according to recent reports. That leaves them 57 hours a week in which to grow up.
- My children attend school 30 hours a week, use about 6 hours getting ready, going and coming home, and spend an average of 7 hours a week in homework - a total of 45 hours. During that time, they are under constant surveillance, have no private time or private space, and are disciplined if they try to assert individuality in the use of time or space.
- That leaves 12 hours a week out of which to create a unique consciousness.
- Of course, my kids eat, and that takes some time - not much, because they've lost the tradition of family dining, but if we allot 3 hours a week to evening meals,
- we arrive at a net amount of private time for each child of 9 hours [per week!].
I want to tell you what the effect is on children of taking all their time from them - time they need to grow up - and forcing them to spend it on abstractions. You need to hear this, because no reform that doesn't attack these specific pathologies will be anything more than a facade.
1. The children I teach are indifferent to the adult world. This defies the experience of thousands of years. A close study of what big people were up to was always the most exciting occupation of youth, but nobody wants to grow up these days and who can blame them? Toys are us.
2. The children I teach have almost no curiosity and what they do have is transitory; they cannot concentrate for very long, even on things they choose to do. Can you see a connection between the bells ringing again and again to change classes and this phenomenon of evanescent attention?
3. The children I teach have a poor sense of the future, of how tomorrow is inextricably linked to today. As I said before, they have a continuous present, the exact moment they are at is the boundary of their consciousness.
4. The children I teach are ahistorical, they have no sense of how past has predestined their own present, limiting their choices, shaping their values and lives.
5. The children I teach are cruel to each other, they lack compassion for misfortune, they laugh at weakness, and they have contempt for people whose need for help shows too plainly.
6. The children I teach are uneasy with intimacy or candor. My guess is that they are like many adopted people I've known in this respect - they cannot deal with genuine intimacy because of a lifelong habit of preserving a secret inner self inside a larger outer personality made up of artificial bits and pieces of behavior borrowed from television or acquired to manipulate teachers. Because they are not who they represent themselves to be the disguise wears thin in the presence of intimacy so intimate relationships have to be avoided.
7. The children I teach are materialistic, following the lead of schoolteachers who materialistically "grade" everything - and television mentors who offer everything in the world for free.
8. The children I teach are dependent, passive, and timid in the presence of new challenges. This is frequently masked by surface bravado, or by anger or aggressiveness but underneath is a vacuum without fortitude.
I could name a few other conditions that school reform would have to tackle if our national decline is to be arrested, but by now you will have grasped my thesis, whether you agree with it or not. Either schools have caused these pathologies, or television, or both. It's a simple matter [of] arithmetic, between schooling and television all the time the children have is eaten away. That's what has destroyed the American family, it is no longer a factor in the education of its own children. Television and schooling, in those things the fault must lie.
Gatto's book, The Underground History of American Education (Oxford Village Press, 2000), gives complete background and sources for understanding the intentional "dumbing down" of public education to create a consumer and working class basis for commercial profit. Gatto says it was not a conspiracy as such that brought this about, but numerous factors and the implicit bargain of giving up our freedom and quality schooling in exchange for prosperity and a higher material quality of life. It is now becoming apparent, however, that the bar is set too low for either human good or the future prosperity of corporations.
Do you agree? Before concluding this first question, read several of the online essays by John Taylor Gatto, especially *1*The Public School Nightmare: Why fix a system designed to destroy individual thought?
***1*Parker Charter Essential School in Ayer, Mass. (on the former Ft. Devens grounds) is the best example of a public school moving in the direction of a high quality, democratic education. Check out their curriculum, assessment, and other online resources!
The ***1*Coalition of Essential Schools also has numerous links showing how SOME schools avoid the problems Gatto cites.
**Tools for Small Schools has resources to aid in converting big schools into several smaller schools--the single most powerful reform method.
**The *1*Catalog of School Reform Models lists numerous efforts to find better ways to educate students.
**Empowering Students: Essential Schools' Missing Link shows the process and difficulties experienced as teachers turn more responsibility for learning over to students.
**Lastly, two positive yet difficult directions for positive, productive reform are 1) Small Schools By Choice, meaning breaking big schools down into "houses" or "clusters" of 70-120 students each. This helps students and teachers to know each other better--and results in higher attendance, achivement, and less violence. Smaller school units also make it easier to bring about 2) Parent and Family Engagement as a Reform Strategy. Give consideration to both of these dimensions of reform in this inquiry.
[Be sure your "answer" addresses the impact of classroom assessment, multiple measures, especially RUBRICS,and self-evaluation.]
English Language Arts
English Language Arts
[Be sure your "answer" addresses discipline and classroom management issues (teacher and school), effects of student choice in assignments and activities and voice in how the class is run and they are evaluated, Success/Achievement vs. Fear/Failure Orientations, and a variety of approaches.
Marshall McLuhan said, "We shape our tools; thereafter, our tools shape us." Have video and computer games, e-mail and cell phones, MTV and the Internet re-shaped student learning styles? The first two articles suggest such shaping has taken place, and the third gives examples of educational responses.
[Be sure your "answer" addresses practices that will help all students, especially inclusion, differentiated instruction, multiple intelligence, and a variety of approaches.]
The following sites will give you resources for developing your ideas and answersfor this essential question.
- *1*IN-SITES for INCLUSION
- ThinkQuest theAbleDisAbled
- Teaching English Language Learners
- Special Education and the Real Meaning of LD
- DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION - Research shows a tremendous "undertow" in teaching toward "one size fits all" procedures of teachers working with the whole class. Strategies to help all students include learning logs and peer assisted learning.
- Double Entry Journals and Learning Logs
- Assessing Students with Interactive Collaborative Learning Logs
- Study Buddy - The "buddy system" applied to learning
- Insites for BILINGUAL EDUCATION
"Brain Gym" and "One Brain" demonstrate the power of MOVEMENT activities to reverse learning disabilities.
- The Brain Gym Connection
- Brain Gym
- ONE BRAIN
- The Institute of Heartmath
- ADD/ADHD and Brain Gym
- Emotional I.Q. and Multiple Intelligences
- INCLUSION
- FAMILY VILLAGE SCHOOL
- INCLUSION HOME PAGE
- INCLUSION - Table of Contents
- ALL THE BEST ANSWERS FOR AT-RISK, TROUBLED, ADD, TRUANT YOUTH
- BASIC SKILLS
- DOCUMENTS ON DEPRESSION and SUICIDE
- BECOMING A BRILLIANT STAR
- CONTENT-SPECIFIC LEARNING STRATEGIES DATABASE
- MULTICULTURAL TEACHERS' CORNER
- PBS: The MULTICULTURAL CLASSROOM
- DIVERSITY IN AMERICA
- FACING HISTORY AND OURSELVES
- PBS RECOMMENDED WEB SITES ON RACE AND RACE RELATIONS
- RESOURCES for DIVERSITY
IN WHAT WAYS MIGHT MY FRAMING and USING ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS HELP STUDENTS LEARN MORE AND DEEPER?
EXAMPLES of TOPICS for ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
Natural Sciences
Social Studies
Mathematics
Literature
At the heart of good thinking, David Perkins suggests in his 1992 book Smart Schools, is the "thinking disposition" an inclination to learn that encompasses the abilities or "know-how" we want children to acquire. Good teachers model, cultivate, point out, and reward these dispositions, he says, in everything from classroom discussions to assessment activities. Perkins and his colleagues Eileen Jay and Shari Tishman offer the following model of the thinking dispositions.
All courses and web pages Copyright © 2002-2005