[Text: Edgar Allan Poe, "Morning on the Wissahiccon" (A), from The Opal (for 1844), spring or
summer 1843, pp. 249-256.]
MORNING ON THE WISSAHICCON.
BY EDGAR A. POE.
THE natural scenery of America has often been contrasted, in its general features as well as in
detail, with the landscape of the Old World — more especially of Europe — and not deeper has
been the enthusiasm, than wide the dissension, of the supporters of each region. The discussion
is one not likely to be soon closed, for, although much has been said on both sides, a world more
yet remains to be said.
The most conspicuous of the British tourists who have attempted a comparison, seem to regard
our northern and eastern seaboard, comparatively speaking, as all of America, at least as all of
the United States, worthy consideration. They say little, because they have seen less, of the
gorgeous interior scenery of some of our western and southern districts — of the vast valley of
Louisiana, for example, — a realization of the wildest dreams of paradise. For the most part,
these travellers content themselves with a hasty inspection of the natural lions of the land — the
Hudson, Niagara, the Catskills, Harper's Ferry, the lakes of New York, the Ohio, the
[page 250:] prairies, and the Mississippi. These, indeed, are objects well worthy the
contemplation even of him who has just clambered by the castellated Rhine, or roamed
By the blue rushing of the arrowy Rhone;
but these are not all of which we can boast; and, indeed, I will be so hardy as to assert that there
are innumerable quiet, obscure, and scarcely explored nooks, within the limits of the United
States, that, by the true artist, or cultivated lover of the grand and beautiful amid the works of
God, will be preferred to each - and to all of the chronicled and better accredited scenes to
which I have referred.
In fact, the real Edens of the land lie far away from the track of our own most deliberate
tourists — how very far, then, beyond the reach of the foreigner, who, having made with his
publisher at home arrangements for a certain amount of comment upon America, to be furnished
in a stipulated period, can hope to fulfil his agreement in no other manner than by steaming it,
memorandum-book in hand, through only the most beaten thoroughfares of the country!
I mentioned, just above, the valley of Louisiana. Of all extensive areas of natural loveliness,
this is perhaps the most lovely. No fiction has approached it. The most gorgeous imagination
might derive suggestions from its exuberant beauty. And beauty is, indeed, its sole character. It
has little, or rather nothing, of the sublime. Gentle undulations of soil, interwreathed with
fantastic crystallic streams, banked by flowery [page 251:] slopes, and backed by a forest
vegetation, gigantic, glossy, multicoloured, sparkling with gay birds and burthened with perfume
— these features make up, in the vale of Louisiana, the most voluptuous natural scenery upon
earth.
But, even of this delicious region, the sweeter portions are reached only by bypaths. Indeed, in
America generally, the traveller who would behold the finest landscapes, must seek them not by
the railroad, nor by the steamboat, nor by the stage-coach, nor in his private carriage, nor yet
even on horseback — but on foot. He must walk, he must leap ravines, he must risk his neck
among precipices, or he must leave unseen the truest, the richest, and most unspeakable glories
of the land.
Now in the greater portion of Europe no such necessity exists. In England it exists not at all.
The merest dandy of a tourist may there visit every nook worth visiting without detriment to his
silk stockings; so thoroughly known are all points of interest, and so well-arranged are the means
of attaining them. This consideration has never been allowed its due weight, in comparisons of
the natural scenery of the Old and New Worlds. The entire loveliness of the former is collated
with only the most noted, and with by no means the most eminent items in the general loveliness
of the latter.
River scenery has, unquestionably, within itself, all the main elements of beauty, and, time out
of mind, has been the favourite theme of the poet. But much of this fame is attributable to the
predominance of travel in fluvial over that in mountainous districts. In the same
[page 252:] way, large rivers, because usually highways, have, in all countries, absorbed an
undue share of admiration. They are more observed, and, consequently, made more the subject of
discourse, than less important, but often more interesting streams.
A singular exemplification of my remarks upon this head may be found in the Wissahiccon, a
brook, (for more it can scarcely be called,) which empties itself into the Schuylkill, about six
miles westward of Philadelphia. Now the Wissahiccon is of so remarkable a loveliness that,
were it flowing in England, it would be the theme of every bard, and the common topic of every
tongue, if, indeed, its banks were not parcelled off in lots, at an exorbitant price, as
building-sites for the villas of the opulent. Yet it is only within a very few years that any one has
more than heard of the Wissahiccon, while the broader and more navigable water into which it
flows, has been long celebrated as one of the finest specimens of American river scenery. The
Schuylkill, whose beauties have been much exaggerated, and whose banks, at least in the
neighbourhood of Philadelphia, are marshy like those of the Delaware, is not at all comparable,
as an object of picturesque interest, with the more humble and less notorious rivulet of which we
speak.
It was not until Fanny Kemble, in her droll book about the United States, pointed out to the
Philadelphians the rare loveliness of a stream which lay at their own doors, that this loveliness
was more than suspected by a few adventurous pedestrians of the vicinity. But, the "Journal''
having opened all eyes, the Wissahiccon, to [page 253:] a certain extent, rolled at once into
notoriety. I say "to a certain extent,'' for, in fact, the true beauty of the stream lies far above the
route of the Philadelphian picturesque-hunters, who rarely proceed farther than a mile or two
above the mouth of the rivulet — for the very excellent reason that here the carriage-road stops. I
would advise the adventurer who would behold its finest points to take the Ridge Road, running
westwardly from the city, and, having reached the second lane beyond the sixth mile-stone, to
follow this lane to its termination. He will thus strike the Wissahiccon, at one of its best reaches,
and, in a skiff, or by clambering along its banks, he can go up or down the stream, as best suits
his fancy, and in either direction will meet his reward.
I have already said, or should have said, that the brook is narrow. Its banks are generally,
indeed almost universally, precipitous, and consist of high hills, clothed with noble shrubbery
near the water, and crowned at a greater elevation, with some of the most magnificent forest
trees of America, among which stands conspicuous the liriodendron tulipiferum. The immediate
shores, however, are of granite, sharply-defined or moss-covered, against which the pellucid
water lolls in its gentle flow, as the blue waves of the Mediterranean upon the steps of her
palaces of marble. Occasionally in front of the cliffs, extends a small definite plateau of richly
herbaged land, affording the most picturesque position for a cottage and garden which the richest
imagination could conceive. The windings of the stream are many and abrupt, as is
[page 254:] usually the case where banks are precipitous, and thus the impression conveyed to
the voyager's eye, as he proceeds, is that of an endless succession of infinitely varied small
lakes, or, more properly speaking, tarns. The Wissahiccon, however, should be visited, not like
"fair Melrose,'' by moonlight, or even in cloudy weather, but amid the brightest glare of a
noonday sun; for the narrowness of the gorge through which it flows, the height of the hills on
either hand, and the density of the foliage, conspire to produce a gloominess, if not an absolute
dreariness of effect, which, unless relieved by a bright general light, detracts from the mere
beauty of the scene.
Not long ago I visited the stream by the route described, and spent the better part of a sultry
day in floating in a skiff upon its bosom. The heat gradually overcame me, and, resigning myself
to the influence of the scenes and of the weather, and of the gently moving current, I sank into a
half slumber, during which my imagination revelled in visions of the Wissahiccon of ancient
days — of the "good old days'' when the Demon of the Engine was not, when pic-nics were
undreamed of, when "water privileges'' were neither bought nor sold, and when the red man trod
alone, with the elk, upon the ridges that now towered above. And, while gradually these conceits
took possession of my mind, the lazy brook had borne me, inch by inch, around one promontory
and within full view of another that bounded the prospect at the distance of forty or fifty yards. It
was a steep rocky cliff, abutting far into the stream, and [page 255:] presenting much more of the
Salvator character than any portion of the shore hitherto passed. What I saw upon this cliff,
although surely an object of very extraordinary nature, the place and season considered, at first
neither startled nor amazed me — so thoroughly and appropriately did it chime in with the
half-slumberous fancies that enwrapped me. I saw, or dreamed that I saw, standing upon the
extreme verge of the precipice, with neck out-stretched, with ears erect, and the whole attitude
indicative of profound and melancholy inquisitiveness, one of the oldest and boldest of those
identical elks which had been coupled with the red men of my vision.
I say that, for a few moments, this apparition neither startled nor amazed me. During this
interval my whole soul was bound up in intense sympathy alone. I fancied the elk repining, not
less than wondering, at the manifest alterations for the worse, wrought upon the brook and its
vicinage, even within the last few years, by the stern hand of the utilitarian. But a slight
movement of the animal's head at once dispelled the dreaminess which invested me, and aroused
me to a full sense of the novelty of the adventure. I arose upon one knee within the skiff, and,
while I hesitated whether to stop my career, or let myself float nearer to the object of my
wonder, I heard the words "hist! hist!'' ejaculated quickly but cautiously, from the shrubbery
overhead. In an instant afterwards, a negro emerged from the thicket, putting aside the bushes
with care, and treading stealthily. He bore in one hand a quantity of salt, and, holding it towards
the elk, gently yet steadily approached. The noble animal, although a little fluttered,
[page 256:] made no attempt at escape. The negro advanced; offered the salt; and spoke a few
words of encouragement or conciliation. Presently, the elk bowed and stamped, and then lay
quietly down and was secured with a halter.
Thus ended my romance of the elk. It was a pet of great age and very domestic habits, and
belonged to an English family occupying a villa in the vicinity.
[In the next to final paragraph, beginning "I say that . . . ," T. O. Mabbott erroneously prints the
sentence, "In an instant afterwards, a negro . . . " as "In an instant afterwords, a negro," with an
"o" rather than an "a" in "afterwards." This error is repeated in the Library of America edition
and several others, which base their texts on that of Mabbott.]
[In The Opal, this article follows an engraving of an elk, standing on a bluff. The engraving it
titled "Morning."]
~~~ End of Text ~~~
[S:0 - Opal, 1844]