Welcome to the
fastest yet most solid(ly formatted)
poetry on earth: over
88 files (averaging over 88 colourful Kz) worth of contextual
BLABS=
Bottom
Line
Aphoristically
Ballistic
Solutions
meaning:
Solutions which break uncivilly polarizing centralizations up or open,
wether
institutionally animated or simply, inertly dormant (yet
animatable) by
pushing the logistic limits inventively, notably those (rocks) constraining
vertical metabolisms (of trees).
Half of this site was created/gestating during
the 80ties (links thereto start at the last
quarter of this file) and the rest since then
(latest files at tops of all content files).
Last corrections/updates and add ontos: july 99
Welcome
(once again if you made it past the first hurdles) to: Bottom
line
aphoristically
ballistic
solutions
(afford
and) arouse
beleaf
systemics
by
piet the punchline pioneer who
shuns not hardest of tasks: (no,
not leading a paper and print free life or a personally owned phone, computer
and car free one too, that's easy; but) to
pinch pith to most universally assimilable of powders cause "it ain't so
bad to be a paracletic dabbler with all these newspfangled plexciting
and gruesomely growsomizing autonomobiles"
Switch
to soundbite sampled files of the newer works at this site from Blabsabs_Index.htm
Use the links in the latter half to
reach my older work
(via appetizing one
or two line characterizations of the aphorisms, essays and segments (those
with titles are listed in the table_of_contents.htm)
which vary in size from a few lines to a page or two from )
or
reach them via brief descriptions and collected keywords in the abstracts
file.
One
may switch to some other people's work I admire
and exhibit via the /guest_appearances/intro_to_currency_issues.htm;
my several (11 files) list interactions via: table
of contents for all list post files; my(11 file) correspondence
collection.
aim
responses at: poetpiet@hotbot.com
Sad the
dreamscape turned into a fence? Here's how to deal with that along with
whatever else is too dense and tense. (Only
partly hypered) link files at this site are
commendablinklist.htm
and
new_links
and
recent_links.htm
and
fifth_linklist.htm
and an (almost fully hypered) second
priority file with Balkan
sites, lists and (re)commentations
||||
|||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
About
the other colours in this file:
All
dates, adressees and/or subjects (if and when provided) at the beginning
of a post bear/wear this colour. My words are
red the first fourhth of this file, green
in the second, blue in the third and
vary
considerably
in
the last. So
they don't
only change whenever a different citee/writer/speaker is next.The
following 2 sets of remarks were valid when and while I had all my subscribed
list selections criss-crossing in the same files but now that I seperated
them, no one body carries one colour throughout a file consistently (and
neither do I) and sothe following
preminders no longer apply:
throughout
the first half of this file all my writs, responses and provocations are
in this colour; in the second half they are
in dark grey. my sparring partners are given
others like so: firstCircle
(chavEZ) Louis Proyect defends this colour
here. Texts written by meself are red
in the first quarter of this file. The
second quarter shows them off in this colour. The
third quarter has magenta following the winding ways of my key board compositions
(unlike the paper initiated ones in the first half of my page). The
final quarter colour for my keystrokes is this one.
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|||||||
about helmet laws: security as purely feeling and senses derived embedding vs 'reason' Inspired by the hopi red helmeted white brother tale, my own webpage, showing me with one (sort of, by happenchance) and a discussion at csf about helmetlaws. dear bill and phil, (pen-l'ers; phillp2@Ms.UManitoba.CA, rael@zopyra.com) I am a helmetless rider by preference. Allow me to make some defence. Yall wrote: We have banned helmetless riders because of the selfish cost they impose upon others. Cyclists without helmets cause an enourmous extra cost to the insurance system that is passed on to other sensible drivers/riders. me: Seems like a sensible statement at first site but under slightly intensified magnification one sees the absurdities spinning out of control (hopefully); take the case of feeling secure bycause one drives a tank for starters..... One must give people around one a chance to flex their ire upon one and prepare to profit from it whenever possible. It is the equivalent of arguing for the elimination of laws against drunk driving because the cost such idiots cause end up being passed on to others and, in our case, to the health system which must be paid by everyone. I am all in favour of individual freedom -- up to the point that it begins to destroy other, innocent people's freedom. Helmet and seatbelt laws are the beginning of freedom for others on the road. me: One cannot rig the demand for respect, only give it and helmet or no helmet is not the issue there, is it? God's and the Great spirit's divine justice tools buried in genetics? Ha, we'll crack that code with one hand behind our back (meanwhile employed in the encryption monopoly business. Playing God has always beat playing doctor since people can't seem to invest their children with themselves fully enough anymore. In so far as daredevilry and defiance comes into it; yes, this excalates damages but again relatively independent of implements, only inert till it comes to implementation which gives us excalation squared and powered up out of sight to the point of pulverization if you like. Witness again, security derived from a highly destructive 'protector': the atom bomb. In my case, the umpteenth tickets I collected for the said offense were idiotic. 1) I peddle away under the blazing Auzzie sun and a helmet makes your head boil and blurs the sharpness of your senses. 2) I do not put a helmet on and depend on it in the sense of affordable laxness cause you are more 'liable' to do than to suffer damage. I concentrate on my surroundings in a hyper defensive mode and in thicker traffic will swerve like wildwater flowcourse, ready to hit the ditch any minute and using the narrowest gaps. Out of sight before you know it. My 1/64th drop of jewish wonderlust? That is not to say I trusted all truckers coming up behind me Stateside (where I peddled crosscontinent on an abandoned bicycle using dumpstered spare parts using freeways a lot) to toe the line as well I did myself and they could see me hog the white line from miles away, so they stayed in their lanes confidently which gave me a hell of a boost from slipstream currents. I was weighted down enough to not swerve at all from that. 3. I do not buy the parallel with forcing people to eat broccoli etc or banning liquor or tobacco consumption as some have suggested to me off-list. First of all, we do try to compensate, in part, for the costs of tobacco and liquor in our health costs by "sin taxes" which are paid *only by those that indulge*. And indeed, in the case of tobacco, restrictions on its use are becoming more and more common -- e.g. at the University of Manitoba, smoking is banned in most if not all the buildings. This is true also of all government buildings and in all stores. In some Canadian cities, smoking is also banned in restaurants. Nor is this just in Canada. The alternative to helmet laws would be to charge an insurance surcharge to bikers who refuse to wear helmets but the cost of enforcement might be prohibitive, or the cost of the insurance might then be prohibitive. That still would not compensate the 'innocent victim' in 2 above. me: The sin to be paid by gullibles? Can a river protest to dumpings. The sin is making a lot of money from all sorts of nonessential dependencies. Further, driving/riding is not a necessity or a basic human right -- it is subject to certain rules -- that you have a valid drivers licence; that if you eyesight is impaired, that you wear corrective lenses; that your vehicle meets certain safety standards; that your vehicle is equipt with certain safety and environmental protection devices, etc. Helmets can be seen as just one of those safety protection devices. Oh yeah? Standardization one size fits all monopolies commonly sensual diversity gone haywire and widthbandied about ...is that so great? Mass society likes a snug fit and intensification, how else could you concentrate enough to have an orgasm instead of just howls of laughter in its own good time cause we just saw a pricelessly cute mad max vehicle go by? Speaking of which, you know the 17th century type sailing ship model. Now imagine one just the size of a seat with an enormous pole curling semi straight forward instead of a mast but 28 times as thick, near the front of which sprocket and peddles help propel the whole thing forward. Made of ashwood. Suspended low rider bicycle, the first one I'm utterly charmed with and I see many since I went to my dentist who is a fanatic, to remove all my amalgam fillings. There is a funny bike on my homepage by the way. Yall: it is not as important an issue as poverty and starvation, but it is easier and relatively costless to solve. me: None of the lawchanges made independent of each other will do. Anyhow, this is the last I will post on this issue. me: Wish I could say the same. some more helmet law ideology: Wed, 24 Feb 1999 11:27:04 -0000 subject: born to set the helmet on the run: this morning I walked to the corner of my relatively, to the real busy street (((behind which lies the park, so I swerve with, were it not for my routine and virtuoso expertise, daredevilish narrow margins ((by the way, there are none such in places like berlin, America, australia....once the traffic roars off between full stops (none of which I need do in A'dam neither) one just has to stand there and let the waves of poisons flood one's senses))) for once, since I lost the key to me bike lock, and near that corner there is a fighting gear shop, you know the amateur sportsy spectacle type. Well in the window was a very dark purple, undoubtedly nice and light modern boxing helmet with lines, curves, even airholes, and get this, it said it all (a confirmation of last night's efforts at least), the brandname was: macho warrior. Now for the record I better confess I once flew off a 50 cc souped up "crosser", my nickname "piet sputter" at the time, and woke up hours later with a scraped back but without a personality (or with a clean slate one); it decided to come or was sent back (after postponement of some final either/or knot netting praps...) some hours later leaving my folks in all states at my bedside in the mean time. Concussion. I was wearing a helmet at the time of these training laps on my privileged and very expensive 10 hp. screamer. My folks stopped funding my racing efforts after that. I had not lost consciousness, only memory and my mates got suspicious after I sorta kept asking what time it was in the pitstop. Well to conclude this dirt on meself as a potstip story: Fuck the linear opposition jojo joust and high speed risky running arms race born from the same seesaw sentiment helmet laws are based on. I'm working on a massive post concerning this so brace your wellmet selves. Of course, were I to become a fire fighter, I'd use the latest too. letter to the cornell fellow:--already have a grip, can offer you some scope though. I'll give you a hint: The more armor a man uses the more reckless he behaves. That's not to put down padded confrontations but confusion abounds. I am reminded of that genius neologism: confliction!!! What bounty we wurriors dredge up from the pools of our brains; some weird continuation and echo of cannibalism I'm sure. You would have to lock a monkey up before he gets interested in a computer.
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999 12:43:55 Tully wrote: Why shouldn't you have to wear a helmet to prevent higher insurance rates? Why should society bear the costs of your reckless behavior? This isn't the 19th century and, frankly, these kinds of libertarian ideas are just passe.
risky, extreme, high potential and charge armor vs amicable insurance, protection and security self vs collective: tully no likes driving so other people pay less either. Her interpretation mixes metaphors but not inextricably or unredeemably as I hope to prove: It would be true if "other people" are the ones driving bigger tanks and coercing the tankless taskforce to give up life and limb to merge with cueing, cancercausing, cantankerous tank hankerers. Owhey, lets count our clashings, who loves Danny Kay? Truth is we, in the latter category including helmetless riders and native cultures (I maintain and aim to proclaim their problems are the same) pay more (and more) to secure a 'sense' of safety for them bullies (ah how disgustingly macho and muscular those gorrillas are no? They don't amongst themselves so much but actually cause other kinds of monkeys to fight each other fairly bloodily. See "Demonic males"), you know the ones who think it can be found if not projected in- and onto a less deterrent than dangerous arms and space race. More on that under fire, heart and such. bottom line: everybody up and down the line pays more, gets in debt to an immobilizing and unredeemable degree cause some want tanks and others are suckers for these fierce forces (jewish finance for instance; they often had no choice but to let the ruler milk and bleed them. The vica versa version such as the "Jew sweet" novel by Feuchtwanger (biased according to S Gilman but I find it appropriately wideranging and contrastatious; reminiscent of the Dutchman Samuel Goudsmit who must have known his pappenheimers, hemoglobalur hi maters). Dreamer vs schemer:The calm collected poised pose vs I can be reckless cause you're not using your head covering your hide and defending your turf with might right (success at which is our (headstart) prerogative so you are over-ruled and illegal either way). Who wants extatic esthetics when functional superiority is on sale? Nothing like a good (self)education to make a sense of loss cut both ways.......
A heartstart (on feelings hurtful and heady): but first: A shorted out one o longer welcomes, harbours, absorbs parts of and/or plays along with the chaosmos flooding in from all depths of space; this inner stricture is reflected in the 'need' and greed for outer ones and a metabolism which upsets spinrates instead of setting 'm up (the latter expression is as fraught with dual and dichotomous meanings as any of the ones neighbouring but unneigbourly border embittered peoples (not even hunter gatherer and monkeys exempt. In fact, light itself had a weightproblem when precipitating into matter until it gets amused and distracted by learning to count beyond the jew's monopoly: number 2) have wrangled over and approached with opposing, wether in- or obverse, intent ut those who understand my work well enough should and could sense the thrillionth hint from a mile away :) Let's see if I remember some driving lessons from Vienna (courtesy Arnold Keyserling): earth = sensing; food water = security; social and outward diversifyer. air = selfpreservation; inward diversifyer. fire = agression; preservation of the species. The amount of usable (usefully fused) fire determines status in the future if we get over the task of containing pesky testes. History is at the mutable stage now: abuse of fire is the rage (one could object and say: all fires are contained and intended; nothing wild left; most fire is purposeful nowadays; it propels and heats or something; we may grow a lot less but also replace wild surface fires with well dosed, gaged and tuned forms pumped up from below; Star (or was it Ish) wouldn't have received such an enormously precious impression of off her trip contrasting with yet made possible by that fast conveyance. Don't get me wrong. I will have little of such cynical stuff myself and am trying hard here to find fault effectively). The cardinal (previous) stage vegetated away in and as preuse of fire. Hard to say what climates and lifeforms passed the review and muster up during them aeons but I bet it was a lot more psychedelic than silly dinosaurs make one extrapolatively extract and suspect. We must now try for an economic, efficient, ingenuous time; usably fused fire forsterment waging age. Partly inspired by a book called the language crystal by a NYC rawfooder who's apartment gets no sun. He would join a sensible community too. Proximity comes in 2 flavors: one repels, the other attracts. Hurt feelings result from unheeded hints about imposition and crowding on the one hand and unanswered invitations on the other. A tip of an iceberg bobbing in a swell of souped up chemistry full of loops feedback, clutter, distractions, assaults, insurrection, invasions, static and quiet extasy. Hurt feelings can be evoked by unexpressed insensitivity and incapacity, allowing expectations of toned training and well attuned exercise of discretion stroking with one's own set of values even and especially when instrumentarium, gauging standard, sense development and a host of other culturally embedded routines obviously just don't mesh. Every mystery blooms on a pile of old shit. But the biggest amount of civilization fostering soil isn't so (self)refreshing anymore. Aversion to its abuse set me off travelling but I'm back trailing the worst of the US behind me it seems and that's embarrasing. A bad easy ample aghen. Dad warned me not to marry out of blood, league, class or even county but my eclectic gregariousness shaped by 60s and 70s Dutch television flavors made me a social and/or asocial freak, an infertile hybrid (got 2 kids; one in the US, never get to see 'm though, that's how bad it got to be with me though I can't believe it's that bad to be with me), unique. An eye in the universal normstorm; a cliff in the sea of sentiments; good placement offor windmilling opportearnity. Taking people on dizzying rides when tackle-clamped (onto <squared>) the wrong way.
Re: Broken Chains and
air and terra roar On Tue, 23 Feb 1999 12:16:34 Rabid Wolf
wrote: And that is why we wish to return
to a traditional life.... No cars, electricity, phones, not even kerosene.
I have lived that way once, but family responsibilities brought me back
to "civilization".... I have never forgiven myself for returning. I was
raised knowing how to live off the land. Drop me nearly anywhere on Turtle
Island with little more than a blanket, in all probability, I will survive.
Many think they know what this kind of living is like, they do not. There
are hardships they cannot imagine, within days, most would yearn for the
city....but even then, they would never be the same... I am now reaching
the point where my contempt for the city increases daily.
>I hold the entirety of
it all in disdain. That I have a wife (who would >NEVER live traditionally
-- she is a Scotch-Irish, Roman Catholic city girl) >and a child, are
the only things that hold me here. Soon, even that may not >be enough.
Rabid
--Select a nice bouquet of people knitnetknotting
a social safety net and pooling money together and off you go. I'm game
for buying, protecting and inhabiting a whole watershed preferably including
some old growth myself. Have been for a while but my netpage is not netting
much similarly immature fry yet, perhaps I should set the mesh a little
finer and up the friggin friction factor of pressure a bit ....
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999 09:13:55 reabel wrote:.............????? ....another load of sensible stuff, I'm sure but never a mention of what role mineral powders have to play when sustainability and stability in the sense of eco-Keynesian cycle surmounting in discussed. Seems it is the crowning glory on your heavy load of work which I will read soon so if If I 'm speaking out of turn forgive me.
eZ on cat and mouse: jinksie
would grip their tails tightly and the mice would keep on runnin.
and their tails would stretch and stretch and stretch. the two mice would
look at each other with gleeful smiles thinking they were getting somewhere
and that they had left jinksie in the "dust". next thing they knew
DOING! they were being snapped backward across the living room straight
into jinksie's gullet. a perfect metaphor for folks who believe they can
simply transcend white culture by making a *lifestyle choice*.
>******* Damn; I mean snap!........that's
a rousing cry to the frontline if ever I heard one; nevertheless; a base
from which to operate other than big squats in town or something would
be really nice right now. Perhaps fake tail tips might help too.......
You don't mind if I stick this on my webpage do you? I am not in the habit
of asking and since it is nothing more than a dubious honour to most people,
let me just thank you for making my page a better place to read.
More Helmet hideologoy: The more armor
a man uses the more reckless he behaves. tully
rejoindered: " Without a helmet or in a
convertible with the top down, you are THERE, right there in the moment
and part of everything around you. " ***********
eZ:
maybe this should read: without a helmet or in a convertible with the top
down, you are THERE, right there *in a convertible with the top down*,
right there on a motorcycle, part of one's *idea* of everything around
you. Before anybody, or rather, after everybody has scuffed, let me
add: Of course, if you ask Schwartzkopf, he will tell you that he gets
the instruments of to indulge haywire ire with due to restraint.
I'm getting sick of all these dualisms. Can we move on and start accounting
all the other numbers again. bout 'em complictions (like
this land was our land; that land is your land) 1)
almost every people are highly assimilative and welcoming; suckers for
the outlandishly entertaining but the small letters don't show. That's
why the internet compacted information and fresh clean dust are the best
and most functional forms multicultures can take; no risk of infection
(with proper virus detection and quarantine,
etc). Travelling will dwindle to the sporadic
quester at questing rather than nesting time. Harmless entertainment of
the virile and beautiful only most likely. But when the population pressures
are up and on we see this friendliness toned down a tad in gradations such
as something the aboriginals did (sorry, no
ref so call it a rumor for now): killing male
'mongrel' offspring but leaving mixed blood/bastard girls to live/love
and/or leave as they pleased.
compliction: don't worry my home page is almost full and I will be travelling
to find a countryside location so these rambles will stop soon. Store in
a safe place 28 feet deep and leave to ripen for some time.
A blank cheque to define
borders is only believable when it comes from a safe and godly distance.
Hang loose, it's the realm of fancy values filled impartial remoteness.
The goodless good in dreamtime jargon. All that including fending and blocking
succesfully is OK. But complications arise when the one feeling hurt, and
therefore blocked cause appealed to in a register not available for some
reason or other, wishes to return the unwanted. The hurt arose from the
ungraspable, unimaginable aspects of the offense and so returning can be
a problem. Most people settle for the following compromise as the next
best thing: they look for the weak, blind spots of their opponents or a
place where there defences are down. In a material society possibilities
to stratify sentiments are astronomical. Well it is a perverse sort of
impact equivalent.
pirudox: Psychic assault
sidekicks and tricks us all subductlily Christianity teaches crestiagonization,
meaning crystal inanity. Rancor dictates and justice denies the right to
reciprocate; allows one person's bitten or smitten ear to come back and
retaliate with a kick in the head; apoplectic propporturn-t-earn isms frof-or-manticay
retteketetteketet boom blast bloop. Betah better Betah Beeeeee tssszzin.............
Theta. Who can abate, nay who ate the shearing hiatus between the
simplicity of sharable basics and the science of basic shares? 88 cheers
for him and his whimkin said the injun with the raucous laugh.
eZ:
like squat on somebody else's land....legally of course. great example
of white supremacist alues....everybody sing it now: "this
land is your land, this land is my land...." ++++++++
envirolink.org/orgs/tlio/index
(the land is ours; includes documents
on how to legally win time enough to ingratiate yourself with locals living
near a piece of derelict land you set mind, heart and hand to fixin' up)
**********
Mother Earth News from the mid 1970s.....big movement back then.....became
a cottage industry and spawned the white dominant green economics crowd.....ripped
off native culture big time..
++++++++ I see what you
are saying. Wendel Berry the mother earth mascot has dirtied preciously
few words to indiginous issues. Too little to suit my taste anyway. ------------------
Perhaps some of the injustice you talk about could be fought by giving
people an opportunity to escape from it and start a new life with us. ***********
eZ: key clauses here: "escape from *it*" and "new life with
*us*".......there's a hole in this dinghy before it even gets set in the
water. entiendes?
++++++ si, you imply that not unlike the chosen
vs common people, poor whities are now forever in the hole whatever they
are willing to sacrifice, no matter how much they generously and/or naively
allow to slip from their grasp; you will wearily point *it* out to *us*
at most, then wash your hands of *it* since you haven't the resources in
the first place.........but will graciously append a caveat. We may be
a drop in the bucket but till more hefty heapers come forward it will be
quite effective for those looking. I have personally decided along the
lines of repatriation stimuli and that should please you enough to refrain
from the sort of shit we 've been hearing from Jews a lot longer than from
you lot. here 's another resource (sorry if this is a repeat): lta.org
(land trusts, a semi offshoot from the
once (20ties) considerably popular tax and property laws reformer Henry
George) http://www.landtrust.org (look
for a paper by Mary Lehmann too) http://www.ummfa.org/summary_of_the_land_trust_title.htm
(wording of the act)
..
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 10:05:47
firstCircle wrote: >gente! >i mistated a fact.
concerning the number of americans scheduling >alternative treatment appointments
with practitioners. 450 million is the approximate number of appointments
scheduled, not the number of americans....we'll have to wait another 2
weeks for the population to reach that number, ha! >have a ducky day
chaveZ
I will be
going for my first check in decades with the royal raymond rife method;
guy invented electron microscopy using crystals fiddles with dials registers
frequences and resonances of virus and 'cancels' them; they burst; sorta
like an internal tesla trick I guess. ran something in Paris latest I heard
and didn't know; I thought he had not left the USA documentary exists.
Websites too. Machines available now. He died disillusioned and poor; dinted
his head against the pharmaffia which got started the way described earlier
in this fil:. Moses and Aaron made the people do "burnt offerings"
and got into pyrotechnichemistry with the ashes......
Silvio Gesell
On Tue,
16 Mar 1999 15:23:15 Marco-Aurelio.Borque wrote: >(
Sorry but I cannot consider hunting-gathering seriously for 6 Billion >people)
.
hunting- thinning/ grafting/ planting/ pruning/ pleaching- gathering mayhaps
you
can yes?
for
the next part (3) press here ********
Switch
files within this site via: /Blabsabs_Index.htm
or guest_appearances/intro_to_currency_issues.htm
or /table_of_contents.htm
or go
to the table of contents for all list post files
nedstat
installed
in the middle of july 99
Is this
the only disfunctional counter(ring) culture left?