Editorial: National Realignment Plan, Part III.
NATIONAL REALIGNMENT PLAN (PART III)
With the recent influx of Division 2 and 3 teams into the ranks of
Division I College Hockey, the need for some type of realignment of the
conferences has arrived. Conferences are becoming bigger and bigger,
which is creating scheduling problems. Some fans (like myself) are
becoming concerned about rivalries becoming less valuable as teams are
forced to give up games against each other. The WCHA, for example, has
placed a moritorium on any further applications of membership into the
league after they voted to admit Mankato State beginning in 1999-2000.
The concern is that the league will become too big, thus creating some
of the problems described above.
The new programs and their fan bases also have concerns. Some of them
are concerned that they won't be accorded the proper respect by the more
established D-I teams. Some fear not getting into a major conference
and not getting to play top notch programs on a regular basis. This has
led to some hard feelings between established programs and the new
members of the D-I family. It also leaves us with the difficult task of
finding an acceptable solution to this whole mess.
The following is a NATIONAL REALIGMENT PLAN. It doesn't involve just
one team or one conference. It looks at the ENTIRE DIVISION I HOCKEY
LANDSCAPE, and tries to develop a comprehensive, common-sense alignment
that will serve the needs of the present as well as the needs of the
future. It likely will never happen (because of politics and the
almighty dollar), but it's a direction that I think we should go in if
we want to make College Hockey even better than it is now. Without any
further delay, here it is:
______________________________________________________________________
WCHA Great Lakes Conference CCHA
Alaska-Anchorage Alaska-Fairbanks *Alabama-Huntsville
*Bemidji State Ferris State Bowling Green
Colorado College Lake Superior State *Findlay (OH)
Denver Michigan State #Mercyhurst
Mankato State #Michigan Tech Miami (OH)
Minn-Duluth Michigan Neb-Omaha
Minnesota *Niagara Notre Dame
North Dakota Northern Michigan Ohio State
St. Cloud State *Wayne State (Mich)
Wisconsin Western Michigan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ECAC Hockey East MAAC
Brown Boston College American International
#Canisius Boston University Bentley
Clarkson Maine Connecticut
Colgate UMass-Amherst Fairfield
Cornell UMass-Lowell Holy Cross
Dartmouth Merrimack Iona
Harvard New Hampshire Sacred Heart
Princeton Northeastern Quinnipiac
Rensselaer Providence
St. Lawrence #Vermont INDEPENDENTS
Union
Yale Air Force
Army
*-Denotes new or emerging D-I program.
#-Denotes a team that has moved from one conference to another.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL TEAMS IN NCAA DIVISION I: 60
______________________________________________________________________
NCAA TOURNAMENT
1. 16 teams
2. Automatic Bids: 6
At-Large Bids: 10
3. Automatic Bids go to the winners of the postseason conference
tournaments.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CAMPUS-SITE FORMAT
1. Seed the teams #1-#16.
2. Higher seeds host best 2 out of 3 playoff series for the first two
rounds.
3. Survivors advance to Final Four.
______________________________________________________________________
EXPLANATION OF CURRENT PLAN (CONFERENCE BY CONFERENCE)
WCHA: The plan keeps Mankato State in the league as was decided this
past spring. It takes out Michigan Tech to make room for Bemidji State,
which starts D-I Hockey for both Men and Women in a couple of years. I
really wanted to put Alaska-Fairbanks in this league, but it just
couldn't be done. The new alignment leaves the WCHA with 5 Minnesota
teams, 2 in Colorado, and 1 each in Alaska, North Dakota, and Wisconsin.
This alignment keeps the league at a reasonable size, and most teams
within reasonable distance of each other.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CCHA: The CCHA is restructured to make room for all of the emerging
programs that are or will be trying to get into the league. First, we
add 6 teams to the CCHA:
Michigan Tech---from WCHA.
Niagara---current D-I Independent.
Wayne State---starting D-I program soon.
Alabama-Huntsville---moving from D-II to D-I.
Findlay (OH)---starting D-I program soon.
Mercyhurst---from the MAAC.
Next, all 9 of the Michigan schools along with Alaska-Fairbanks are
joined together to form the Great Lakes Conference (GLC). The remaining
8 schools will make up the new-look CCHA. The Michigan programs will
benefit from short travel distances and from being able to play teams
from their own state. The only "black sheep" of the bunch is Fairbanks,
whom I couldn't find room for in the WCHA. The new-look CCHA will have
a good mix of established programs and new programs that need a
conference to play in. There also is room for a couple of more teams if
there is future expansion.
ECAC: The ECAC will lose one team (Vermont to Hockey East), and gain
one team (Canisius from the MAAC). Some of my previous plans called for
an extensive restructuring of the ECAC over concerns of overcrowding.
But since the current 12-team format works fairly well and there aren't
enough emerging programs in the east to form another conference, I
decided to leave the ECAC alone.
Hockey East: In order to ease scheduling problems, a 10th team
(Vermont) is added to the conference. Several people have mentioned
Vermont as a good candidate for Hockey East, so I've implemented that
change here.
MAAC: The newest D-I conference is reduced in size from 10 teams to 8
teams. Canisius goes to the ECAC and Mercyhurst goes to the new-look
CCHA. This serves several purposes. One, it makes the league more
geographically sound (Canisius and Mercyhurst are much further west than
the other MAAC schools). Two, it leaves room for future emerging
programs in the east. Three, it helps keep the ECAC at 12 teams and
allows Hockey East to expand to 10 teams. It also allows the new-look
CCHA to reach 8 teams instead of only 7. Overall, these changes will
make several conferences function better in the long run.
INDEPENDENTS: The two service academies (Air Force and Army) will
remain independents. Neither team wants to join a conference, and
neither team could be competitive in a major conference. Keeping these
teams independent is the best solution.
______________________________________________________________________
DESCRIPTION OF NCAA TOURNAMENT
The NCAA Tournament is expanded to 16 teams. Each conference will get
one automatic bid for a total of 6. The other 10 bids will be at-large
and will be based on power rankings. It is assumed that the auto bids
will be awarded to the winners of the conference postseason tournaments.
This plan eliminates the automatic bids for the regular season
champions. It is my belief that 9 times out of 10, the regular season
champions of the major conferences will have the power rating to get
into the tournament with an at-large bid. I think that the NCAA
overreacted to the Colorado College situation in 1994 (CC was left out
of the tournament despite winning the WCHA regular season title). Also,
the tournament is being enlarged by 4 teams. With a 16 team field and
10 at-large bids, the teams that deserve to be there probably will be
there.
The regional format is replaced with the campus-site format. The 16
teams are seeded from 1-16 based on power ratings. Then the top seeds
in the first two rounds host 2 out of 3 game playoff series. The
survivors then advance to the Final Four. I believe that this is the
most fair and equitable way to structure the playoffs. The regional
format has not served College Hockey well. There are too many questions
every year about seeding of teams, which region the teams are placed in,
ect. It has become a political football that people are tired of
throwing around. The campus-site format awards teams based on
season-long performance and allows the hometown fans to watch their
teams in person. There will be no room for whining or complaining.
Teams will get the seeds that they deserve.
______________________________________________________________________
If you have any questions or comments, go to the editorial response board or e-mail me at
unvarnishedtruth@hotmail.com. I look forward to hearing your comments.
GO TO THE EDITORIAL PAGE
GO TO THE MAIN INDEX