With the recent influx of Division 2 and 3 teams into the ranks of Division I College Hockey, the need for some type of realignment of the conferences has arrived. Conferences are becoming bigger and bigger, which is creating scheduling problems. Some fans (like myself) are becoming concerned about rivalries becoming less valuable as teams are forced to give up games against each other. The WCHA, for example, has placed a moritorium on any further applications of membership into the league after they voted to admit Mankato State beginning in 1999-2000. The concern is that the league will become too big, thus creating some of the problems described above. The new programs and their fan bases also have concerns. Some of them are concerned that they won't be accorded the proper respect by the more established D-I teams. Some fear not getting into a major conference and not getting to play top notch programs on a regular basis. This has led to some hard feelings between established programs and the new members of the D-I family. It also leaves us with the difficult task of finding an acceptable solution to this whole mess. The following is a NATIONAL REALIGMENT PLAN. It doesn't involve just one team or one conference. It looks at the ENTIRE DIVISION I HOCKEY LANDSCAPE, and tries to develop a comprehensive, common-sense alignment that will serve the needs of the present as well as the needs of the future. It likely will never happen (because of politics and the almighty dollar), but it's a direction that I think we should go in if we want to make College Hockey even better than it is now. Without any further delay, here it is: ______________________________________________________________________ WCHA Great Lakes Conference CCHA Alaska-Anchorage Alaska-Fairbanks *Alabama-Huntsville *Bemidji State Ferris State Bowling Green Colorado College Lake Superior State *Findlay (OH) Denver Michigan State #Mercyhurst Mankato State #Michigan Tech Miami (OH) Minn-Duluth Michigan Neb-Omaha Minnesota *Niagara Notre Dame North Dakota Northern Michigan Ohio State St. Cloud State *Wayne State (Mich) Wisconsin Western Michigan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ECAC Hockey East MAAC Brown Boston College American International #Canisius Boston University Bentley Clarkson Maine Connecticut Colgate UMass-Amherst Fairfield Cornell UMass-Lowell Holy Cross Dartmouth Merrimack Iona Harvard New Hampshire Sacred Heart Princeton Northeastern Quinnipiac Rensselaer Providence St. Lawrence #Vermont INDEPENDENTS Union Yale Air Force Army *-Denotes new or emerging D-I program. #-Denotes a team that has moved from one conference to another. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL TEAMS IN NCAA DIVISION I: 60 ______________________________________________________________________ NCAA TOURNAMENT 1. 16 teams 2. Automatic Bids: 6 At-Large Bids: 10 3. Automatic Bids go to the winners of the postseason conference tournaments. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CAMPUS-SITE FORMAT 1. Seed the teams #1-#16. 2. Higher seeds host best 2 out of 3 playoff series for the first two rounds. 3. Survivors advance to Final Four. ______________________________________________________________________ EXPLANATION OF CURRENT PLAN (CONFERENCE BY CONFERENCE) WCHA: The plan keeps Mankato State in the league as was decided this past spring. It takes out Michigan Tech to make room for Bemidji State, which starts D-I Hockey for both Men and Women in a couple of years. I really wanted to put Alaska-Fairbanks in this league, but it just couldn't be done. The new alignment leaves the WCHA with 5 Minnesota teams, 2 in Colorado, and 1 each in Alaska, North Dakota, and Wisconsin. This alignment keeps the league at a reasonable size, and most teams within reasonable distance of each other. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- CCHA: The CCHA is restructured to make room for all of the emerging programs that are or will be trying to get into the league. First, we add 6 teams to the CCHA: Michigan Tech---from WCHA. Niagara---current D-I Independent. Wayne State---starting D-I program soon. Alabama-Huntsville---moving from D-II to D-I. Findlay (OH)---starting D-I program soon. Mercyhurst---from the MAAC. Next, all 9 of the Michigan schools along with Alaska-Fairbanks are joined together to form the Great Lakes Conference (GLC). The remaining 8 schools will make up the new-look CCHA. The Michigan programs will benefit from short travel distances and from being able to play teams from their own state. The only "black sheep" of the bunch is Fairbanks, whom I couldn't find room for in the WCHA. The new-look CCHA will have a good mix of established programs and new programs that need a conference to play in. There also is room for a couple of more teams if there is future expansion. ECAC: The ECAC will lose one team (Vermont to Hockey East), and gain one team (Canisius from the MAAC). Some of my previous plans called for an extensive restructuring of the ECAC over concerns of overcrowding. But since the current 12-team format works fairly well and there aren't enough emerging programs in the east to form another conference, I decided to leave the ECAC alone. Hockey East: In order to ease scheduling problems, a 10th team (Vermont) is added to the conference. Several people have mentioned Vermont as a good candidate for Hockey East, so I've implemented that change here. MAAC: The newest D-I conference is reduced in size from 10 teams to 8 teams. Canisius goes to the ECAC and Mercyhurst goes to the new-look CCHA. This serves several purposes. One, it makes the league more geographically sound (Canisius and Mercyhurst are much further west than the other MAAC schools). Two, it leaves room for future emerging programs in the east. Three, it helps keep the ECAC at 12 teams and allows Hockey East to expand to 10 teams. It also allows the new-look CCHA to reach 8 teams instead of only 7. Overall, these changes will make several conferences function better in the long run. INDEPENDENTS: The two service academies (Air Force and Army) will remain independents. Neither team wants to join a conference, and neither team could be competitive in a major conference. Keeping these teams independent is the best solution. ______________________________________________________________________ DESCRIPTION OF NCAA TOURNAMENT The NCAA Tournament is expanded to 16 teams. Each conference will get one automatic bid for a total of 6. The other 10 bids will be at-large and will be based on power rankings. It is assumed that the auto bids will be awarded to the winners of the conference postseason tournaments. This plan eliminates the automatic bids for the regular season champions. It is my belief that 9 times out of 10, the regular season champions of the major conferences will have the power rating to get into the tournament with an at-large bid. I think that the NCAA overreacted to the Colorado College situation in 1994 (CC was left out of the tournament despite winning the WCHA regular season title). Also, the tournament is being enlarged by 4 teams. With a 16 team field and 10 at-large bids, the teams that deserve to be there probably will be there. The regional format is replaced with the campus-site format. The 16 teams are seeded from 1-16 based on power ratings. Then the top seeds in the first two rounds host 2 out of 3 game playoff series. The survivors then advance to the Final Four. I believe that this is the most fair and equitable way to structure the playoffs. The regional format has not served College Hockey well. There are too many questions every year about seeding of teams, which region the teams are placed in, ect. It has become a political football that people are tired of throwing around. The campus-site format awards teams based on season-long performance and allows the hometown fans to watch their teams in person. There will be no room for whining or complaining. Teams will get the seeds that they deserve. ______________________________________________________________________If you have any questions or comments, go to the editorial response board or e-mail me at unvarnishedtruth@hotmail.com. I look forward to hearing your comments.