Our ancient ancestors lived in caves, didn't know language or much about art untill they learned to manifacture stone tools in order to survive easier. They wore animal-skins and at first, they even had to do without fire.

But there are several problems with the above. First of all there is a certain lack of proof regarding the theory that our ancestors lived in caves, certainly there is evidence to believe some caves were used by travellers and 'homeless' in that time, but to conclude ALL of our ancestors therefore must have lived in caves, ofcourse, is jumping to conclusions. That on itself can happen, but the problem with mainstream-science is even many of its claims were disputed long ago, they still remain in the books, they still are teached at school even though they know it's not quite true what they claim or teach.

There are sites in France were thousands of prehistoric stone tools were found. What is really interesting is the fact that really close to this very sites , where stones were found and appearantly manufactured, are also a lot of caves. But what's bothering is that NONE of those showed sign of being used as a living-facility ever! Why didn't any one wonder about that. Just take a look at the monoliths of Carnac or Stonehenge, or the City of Tihuanacu for that matter, and then tell us why NO ONE ever thought it's pretty obvious that if someone builds things like that, would certainly be able to build perfect houses, even building blocks, that could've been very simular to ours.

But there's more that will cast a serious shadow of doubt on the hypothesis of the naive cavemen! How about the fact that a german scientist found an object in Bagdad that could only be interpreted as one thing: an electrical battery, about 3000 years old! Scientists made a replica and used fruit-juice for acid, and...the battery emitted about 3 volt. But have they changed the history books? No, in fact most people don't even know about it's existance. When confronted with this mainstream-scientists go about how one small artifact prodicing such a low voltage isn't any evidence and therefore proves nothing. How narrow-minded can one get, one might ask. If our ancestors were able to produce about 3 volt with a small battery, well, the idea of making larger ones and/or putting them together must've popped up aswell! Also, no matter how high the voltage, since electricity was discovered and used around 3000 years ago and NOT by Franklin, as the history books try to tell us. The south american Chimu were able to use techniques to put on goldlayers that are so sophisticated that we only are able to get the same results today with ELECTRO-chemical processing!

Why, if all this were true, why wouldn't mainstream-science admit or agree? Why the keeping it silent? Ofcourse sinister conspiracy theories and other scary stuff has been given as explanation to this, but we wonder if there really is a Big Conspiracy going on here. But think of it like that, for years those scientists have been coming out of or were 'sponsored by' the christian church. In the very early days it left an enormous imprint on science and its ideas. Now centuries later that is not the biggest problem anymore. But after several big distortions of the past through the coming of religion, the problem of our time is the fact that it's those peoples way to make a living. They allready have their next book ready, there lecture-scedule filled for say a year, their family has to eat, kids need to go to school, morgage has to paid, etc, etc. And since, obviously the large crowd buys it without asking futher questions, why would they step forward and say: "oops...ladies and gentlemen, we actually messed around quite a lot all this time.." Why would they wanna ruin their own career?