Note: Some of these are from before we had automated scoring...
RE: asymmetry, scales, relativity, defenses, controls, anything left still? :-)
[reply from Webmistress to earlier inquiry]"Perhaps that is because the test sample is predominantly female to begin with and from that, inherently the norm would fall on the andro/strong femme line rather than mid andro? It's an interesting question to ponder."
[response from correspondent] Well, that's only some occupational disease of mine... :-) my first thought had been wondering like whether it might have something to do w/ an asymmetry that has been described for the gendering subsystem of many societies. Either it is an ethnographers' projection or 3-gender-systems tend to hive-off the "third gender" from the male category (structurally speaking, not historically) while allowing for more variability in the female category. A typical example would be Ojibwa "male / agookwaa / female". An exception being systems that allow for further subcategorization like Navajo "male / nadleehe (male/true/female) / female" which is perfectly symmetrical. In other words: what is ideologically seen as "middle ground" factually is not. One also could think in the direction of Kessler/Mc Kenna's ("Gender." Wiley 1978) perceptual tests, but I think they are weakly designed (while else the book still is the definitive *vademecum* on gender!!).
As you already had mentioned responding to [other posted response]...w/ a sample of 13 the test breaks a bit as this relatively low number doesn't suffice to establish various scales. Like *tentatively* ('acourse there's some overlap, too):
- the way one deals w/ one's body ("1.When going for a haircut [...]", "10.Your quick snack of choice is [...]")
- manners/etiquette ("2.You are hosting a holiday meal. Do you [...]", "13.When drinking soda, beer or water, you prefer to [...]")
- presentation ("3.When choosing scents for your personal hygiene products, you prefer [...]", "4.When dressing to go hang out with your friends, you prefer to wear [...]")
- lifestyle ("6.Your ideal choice for a new vehicle is [...]", "9.[...] your preferred mode of travel would be [...]", "12.In private spaces, you prefer which type of decor [...]", "11.Choose the career that interests you most [...]")
- being practical ("5.The toilet is overflowing. Do you [...]", "") vs. (complementary)
- being inclined to luxurious idleness ("8.When doing the laundry, do you [...]")
A few questions are directly subject to cultural relativity effects. E.g. to "7.You are out on a date and your friend's breath is less than fresh. Do you [...]" w/in many NA cultures there is only one answer, the others ranging from impolite plump allusion to outspoken offensive, no matter whether you're Extreme Femme or Extreme Butch.
Another problem is the forced answer situation as this is not a test to determine the best candidate. :-) I did repeat it several times and arrived at quite some dispersion. Regarding "orientation" 'acourse nothing changed w/ me as I still love my gf despite her being a "boy" now :-), but preference for F/A/B partners doesn't appear as one of the scales and only is indirectly implied. I could imagine that w/ intersexed and transgendered folks the forced answer situation activates certain defense patterns (there also are clinical observations of similar things frequently happening) -- usually IS then score higher, i.e. more towards the andro/butch direction, while m2f TS score lower, i.e. more towards the femme direction than they "really are". But I'm not sure whether I really can recommend to open this can of worms... Such a test would be no fun any longer and if you include various kinds of control items you can't let people do the scoring themselves.