Marvellous!
Topic: Poker
There's been a lot of crap written about Neil Channing this week, following the online publication of
this interview with Derek Kelly. Neil has a great deal to tell the aspiring gambler and like anyone who tries to help others, he has received a heap of abuse in return. No good deed goes unpunished!
He has a better record in tournaments than a cursory examination of the PokerInEurope database would suggest. It doesn't show that he won two Saturday afternoon comps in the Vic in a row, or that he won a second-chance competition in Binion's and came third in another during the 2004 WSOP.
But that hardly matters, because his speciality is something the most accurate tournament database could never reveal - his ability to create a good gambling
atmosphere. It's one of those skills of the game that is rarely ever written about. To watch him in a cash game is to see a master at work. Few people realise it, but the best poker games are the ones where your opponents don't think they're playing poker, but instead think they are gambling. Neil pushes them in that direction.
Want an example of his genius? Try this - imagine you're playing a cash game in the Vic against a really bad player you've never seen before. You want to know when he's coming back, but you can't be too blatant. What do you say? You might ask how long he's in town, (I often do), but it's a bit of a giveaway. So late in the night, Neil asks:
'Got a long drive home?' It's brilliant. The most harmless question imaginable gets the star to reveal where he's come from, how long he's staying and from there you can try and get him to reveal what night he'll be back so you don't miss him. I tried it once when he wasn't there and it worked a treat.
There are many issues in cash poker that never come up in tournaments, so those who think that $20 rebuy events and $30 freezeouts are the be all and end all of poker never realise how deep you have to think to get your opponents' money into your pocket. A lot of regular cash players never grasp it either. I've seen people with great ability and discipline make no attempt to get people to gamble more recklessly than they planned. They go their whole playing careers without ever realising that there is a dimension to the game that they have never explored. Neil doesn't just aim to figure out how his opponents think. He actually
changes the way they think - making them play the way
he wants them to.
Whatever his technical ability, I assure you that Neil's skills at getting people to gamble are second to none. And I enjoy being in his games just to see him work his magic.
_ DY
at 1:43 AM BST
Updated: Friday, 26 August 2005 3:24 AM BST