Climate researchers are warning that efforts to
reduce air pollution could, if not well designed, make global warming worse. Limiting
emissions of man-made nitrogen oxides, a strategy to control ozone in the lower
atmosphere, would result in increased methane abundance and lead to additional greenhouse
warming, they say. Nitrogen oxides, commonly abbreviated NOx, are shorthand for the
combination of nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide (NO plus NO2) that are produced by
aircraft and automobile emissions, in biomass burning, and by some industrial processes,
as well as by such natural events as lightning.
"Traditionally, atmospheric chemistry research has focused on processes in the
natural and polluted atmosphere, while climate modeling has investigated the impact of
greenhouse gases," says Anne-Marie Schmoltner, director of the National Science
Foundation (NSF)'s atmospheric chemistry program, which funded the research along with
NASA. "However, it is important to recognize the interplay between the chemistry and
the distribution of greenhouse gases. Increasingly complex models such as the one employed
in this study are now able to look at these important interactions."
The research was conducted by Oliver Wild and Hajime Akimoto of the Frontier Research
System for Global Change in Yokohama, Japan, and Michael J. Prather of the University of
California, Irvine. It will appear in the May 1 issue of the journal, Geophysical
Research Letters, published by the American Geophysical Union.
The reason not to concentrate only on reducing nitrogen oxide emissions, they say, is
that there is a marked difference in the short- and long-term effects of doing so.
Increased nitrogen oxide emissions do indeed lead, as is commonly expected, to short-term
warming from increased short-lived ozone in the troposphere, the lower part of Earth's
atmosphere.
Over the following decade, however, these nitrogen oxide emissions lead to reductions
in methane and even ozone, and thus to a net cooling. Overall, the net impact is a slight
cooling for a wide range of locations of nitrogen oxide emissions, and thus reductions in
these emissions, such as from pollution control measures, will eventually add to global
warming.
The scientists note, however, that when emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), which
usually result from the same processes that produce nitrogen oxides, are added to the
equation, the net result is back to global warming. Therefore, they say, efforts to
address issues of urban air quality and global warming must involve combined emission
controls and not just the "quick fix" of reducing local air pollution by
controlling emissions of nitrogen oxides.
It has been difficult for scientists to quantify the greenhouse effect of short-lived
pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide, which do not themselves have a
significant impact on climate. But these gases control the major greenhouse gases --
methane, ozone, and the hydrofluorocarbons - through tropospheric chemistry. This work
adds further evidence to the role of such urban pollutants as indirect greenhouse gases,
which was also reported in the recent assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change.
Wild and his colleagues have developed a new method of quantifying the effect of these
short-term chemical interactions. It expands on their previously published research that
described a tropospheric Chemical Transport Model (CTM) developed at the University of
California, Irvine. This model determines the impact of short-lived regional emissions on
the long-term global climate effect of the methane-carbon monoxide-ozone combination. By
calculating separately the short-term regional effects of those gases and the long-term
global trends of greenhouse gases in general, the authors are able to determine their
combined impact on climate change.
Using the Irvine CTM model, Wild and his colleagues conclude that man-made surface
emissions of nitrogen oxides, taken alone, consistently cause cooling through their impact
on ozone and methane. The amount of cooling varies greatly, depending on the region in
which the emissions occur. The model shows, however, that combined industrial emissions of
nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide always yield a positive result, that is, increased
warming. Therefore, they conclude, "decisions to control global atmospheric ozone and
hence greenhouse warming by cutting nitrogen oxides emissions alone would produce the
opposite effect when the long-term, global changes to both methane and ozone are
considered."
The authors urge that further research be conducted on specific regional impacts of
man-made emissions, which may require the development of regional models to compare with
the CTM.
The study was funded in part by NSF's atmospheric chemistry program and NASA's
atmospheric chemistry modeling and analysis program. NSF PR 01-32 |