| |
Most people live, whether physically, intellectually or
morally, in a very restricted circle of their potential being. They make very
small use of their possible consciousness, and of their soul's resources in
general, much like a man who, out of his whole bodily organism, should get into
a habit of using and moving only his little finger.
William James
Wholeness is the concept that we contain all potentials for any
action, thought, emotion or feeling. While we do not express all our potentials,
we know that they are within us. These "potentials" are the elements
that are aspects of energy. Energy is the substance of which true self is
composed, thus each of us contains all designs that we express into the
physical, emotional, and mental dimensions. In this wholeness, we have the
capacity to display either pole of any duality such as good and bad, generous
and selfish, productive and lazy. All are manifestations of designs. We do not
deny any aspect of ourselves, even when we make mistakes while we learn how to
perform intuitively, effectively, and lovingly in our interactions.
Wholeness exists as a principle even if we do not acknowledge it. When, we
consciously acknowledge our wholeness, we develop a willingness to work with it,
to develop our ability to express ourselves.
The word wholeness comes from the Saxon word, "Hal," from which we
derive the words, "whole," "hale," and "hello" a
greeting by which we wish wholeness upon someone. These words are also related
to "holy" and "health".
The characteristics of wholeness.
| Wholeness is coming to terms. This "coming to terms" starts
with an acknowledgment of the world as it is, inside of us and outside of
us. We know that we cannot repress or ignore that which confronts us but
instead we must create peaceful, constructive relationships because we
intuit that these things have something to contribute to our wholeness,
life, health, and success. We come to terms even if the conditions are
currently disturbing, painful, or apparently negative. Underlying each of
those unpleasant conditions is a design of life that we can understand and
then express in a more productive form.
|
| Wholeness is expansiveness. It is an acknowledgment that all parts of ourselves and our world are not
autonomous, they are members of one large system. When we recognize this
system, we realize that it has a synergistic character, and that "the
whole is greater than the sum of the parts".
| Wholeness is individuality. Wholeness is not an, oceanic oneness, on the contrary, in the first step
toward wholeness, we differentiate and clarify the parts. We separate our ego
from our potential internally, and from social conformity, externally. We
attain wholeness with those distinct parts that make us individual, as we
understand our relationship to them.
| Wholeness is relationship.
We are individuals but we are also a part of many dynamic systems such as
family, culture, or the universe. Neither the individual person nor the individual parts of the psyche can be viewed or understood separately,
because of this relationship. The elements interact on a on to one basis, but each interplay ultimately reverberates through the entire system,
affecting all other parts. We are part of a synchronized, organic, interdependent whole, like the organs of the human body. Even if we are
simply studying the individual self, we must remember that one part of that self is our social interface. This interface is like the handle on a tea
cup, that is part of the cup, but it is that which connects to something else. We cannot understand the cup without understanding also the aspect of
it that extends its structure and purpose beyond itself.
| Wholeness is balance.
We have an equal respect for every aspect of our life, thus, we do not
favor any one part at the expense of the others. We don't spend an
inordinate amount of time developing ourselves physically at a health club
when we need instead to give more time to our family. Out of this base of
equal respect, we do allow values to emerge, making one thing more valuable
than another, but we recognize that the contrary is also worthwhile in its
own time. If we value commitment as a virtue, we also honor our opposing
desire for freedom. We accept both sides of our dualities, knowing that the
characteristics we have selected to define our ego are there only because
they serve our purposes at this time. They are not innately better than the
material that is in our potential. If we insist on one side or the other we
are fighting the dynamics and we are darkening our repressions. Instead, we
can bear the tension of our opposites, enduring the continual conflicts
between our light and dark, our kindness and cruelty, etc.. If we patiently
abide the struggle, we learn from each side and we observe a solution
emerging from the paradox, arising not by rational arbitration or compromise
but by the synthesizing grace of our true self.
| Wholeness is having a center. This center is our true self. The center gives purpose to our activities.
We are not performing unrelated acts, but rather we are choosing acts that
are coordinated to move us in a particular direction in life, toward the fulfillment
of meaningful goals.
| Wholeness is subject to three common fallacies.
In Necessary Wisdom, Charles M. Johnston, M.D., described three errors that
can occur in our quest for wholeness:
| Separation fallacy. This is dualistic thinking, right and wrong, me
and you, us and them, leaders and followers, teachers and students, and good
guys and bad guys. In the separation fallacy, we do not recognize common
qualities and intent between the opposites in a duality.
|
| Unity fallacy. In contrast to the separation fallacy, the unity
fallacy attempts to reduce us all to a common, bland, featureless homogeneity.
The unity fallacy is a category error, trying to achieve a oneness in the human
condition when in fact oneness exists only in the realm of spirit.
|
| Compromise fallacy. Like the unity fallacy, the compromise fallacy
strives to create fairness, but it does so at the expense of individuality and
genius. Johnston says that in this fallacy, we consider various opinions and
then we split the difference. We degrade brilliance in order to meet mediocrity
half way.
|
| | | | | |
Our journey toward wholeness is a return to
wholeness.
We start our infancy in a state of wholeness where we do not recognize
ourselves as being distinct from our surroundings and our mother. Eventually, we
discover that we are a separate individual. We develop our ego and its outer
world manifestations, career, home, family, and social presence. During this ego
building phase, we claim particular traits to constitute our ego and we push the
opposite traits in to our potential. When we become aware of our true self our
perceptions change and we are propelled back toward wholeness. This regained
wholeness, however, is not like the amorphous, oceanic wholeness of infancy, it
is a crisply defined system based upon conscious integration of our inner and
outer worlds.
Next Topic: Individuation
|