U.S.
MILITARY PRESENCE IN PANAMA (1903-1999)
HISTORY
SENIOR MILITARY
COMMANDS AND COMMANDERS
MAJOR
SUBORDINATE COMMANDS
FORCES / UNITS
CHANGING
MISSIONS AND STRATEGIES
MAJOR EVENTS
-- Panama
Canal Treaty Implementation (1979-1999)
ă
Operation
Just Cause (Dec
20, 1989 - Jan 12, 1990)
--
Operation Promote Liberty (Jan
12, 1990 - mid-1994)
--
Operation Safe Haven (Sept
1994-Feb 1995)
EXERCISES /
OPERATIONS
-- Engineering
Exercises (Fuertes Caminos; New Horizons)
-- Other
Exercises
MAJOR
INSTITUTIONS
-- U.S. Army
School of the Americas
-- Inter-American
Air Forces Academy
-- Naval Small
Craft Instruction and Technical Training School (NAVSCIATTS)
-- Army Jungle
Operations Training Center
-- Army Tropic
Test Center
--
Inter-American Geodetic Survey
MILITARY
STEWARDSHIP OF ENVIRONMENT
VIGNETTES
|
|
PANAMA:
Operation Just
Cause
ANTHONY GRAY and
MAXWELL MANWARING
Background
Situation that
Precipitated Just Cause
Unlike other cases
included in this comparative study, the intervention in Panama was
not a peacekeeping operation. It was a unilateral U.S.
intervention in a country where U.S. presence and influence were
overwhelming and cultural, social, and economic ties to the United
States were inextricable. The lessons that emerged from this
operation (as well as from the Somalia action) were to
significantly influence the planning of the operation in Haiti.
Operation Just
Cause was the culmination of a 2?-year effort to remove
General Manual Noriega, Commander of the Panama Defense Force (PDF)
and de-facto ruler, from power after his indictment in the United
States on drug-trafficking charges. U.S. efforts to negotiate
Noriega out of power had failed by May 1988. Ongoing economic
sanctions only hurt the country and were difficult to enforce (in
view of the large U.S. presence). As the crisis progressed, the
U.S. military presence steadily increased, as did efforts to
pressure the PDF through no-notice exercises and testing of check
points. Although a political opposition was slowly coalescing, two
coup attempts by the PDF and massive public demonstrations failed
to unseat Noriega.
____________________________________________________________
Authors’
note: This case study is
based upon personal experiences of the authors, interviews with
numerous other participants, from both the Washington level and
the field, as well as from written accounts. Opinions and accounts
vary, a classic case of “where you stand depends upon where you
sit.”
_______________________________________________________________________________
Events
precipitating the U.S. intervention in 1989 included:
A “school
bus incident” of March 3 involving the children of U.S.
personnel; several low-key PDF incursions onto U.S.
installations including the Arraijan fuel tank farm, and
periodic shooting incidents at the Jungle Operations Training
Center (JOTC)
Nullification
of the May 1989 election of President Guellermo Endara, and Vice
Presidents Arias Calderon and Billy Ford
The
subsequent highly publicized beating of Vice President-elect
Ford
A virtual
declaration of war against the United States by Noriega on
December 15
The
brutalizing of a U.S. Navy lieutenant and threats and assaults
on his wife, and the killing of Marine Lieutenant Robert Paz on
December 16, 1989.1
Capacity for
Self-Governance
At the time of the
intervention, Panama was a self-governing country with functioning
bureaucracy, police, judicial, and prison systems. Although it had
the trappings of a constitutional democracy until the May 1989
election results were nullified, it was a de facto dictatorship
under the control of General Noriega and his PDF. All semblance of
democracy disappeared after Noreiga nullified the results of the
elections and appointed a President. Despite various economic,
political, and social disruptions, including U.S. economic
sanctions, Panamanian government institutions continued to
function.
Strength of
Armed Opposition Groups. The PDF maintained close control
throughout the country. The large-scale public opposition or
“civil crusade” mounted many demonstrations in Panama City but
had no armed capability (see discussion of PDF capabilities for
insurgency below).
Condition of
Economy and Infrastructure. To keep his government afloat,
Noriega exacerbated Panama’s already serious financial problems
and plunged the country deeper into debt. At the time of the
invasion, total government debt was approximately $5 billion; the
unemployment rate was about 25 percent; the nation had lost over 2
years of foreign and domestic investment; the international
banking sector had suffered severe damage; the number of
merchant vessels registered in Panama had declined; and hundreds
of businesses had been forced into bankruptcy. Systematic looting
of the economy by Noriega and his cronies exacerbated the
situation. By 1989, the central government finances had dropped
almost by half over the previous 2 years to $598 million.2
Extent of
Social Disruption. Because of devastation to Panama’s
economy and U.S. attempts to split the Panamanian public and PDF
from Noriega, long-existing class and racial divisions were
exacerbated. Traditional norms of political behavior, which had
made Panama a relatively nonviolent society, were attenuated. This
was manifested in Noriega’s creation of “dignity battalions”
and the brutality they inflicted. The prolonged crisis created an
atmosphere of fear, suspicion, and hatred that could require many
years to repair.3
Status of Domestic
and Public Security Apparatus
PDF
Capabilities. Panama’s institutions were either tools of the
Noriega dictatorship, or they were neglected and dysfunctional. In
the decades prior to the U.S. invasion of December 1989, the
Panamanian National Guard and its successor, the PDF, had become
the main vehicle for power and repression in Panama. The PDF was
an amalgamation of the National Guard, the Air Force, the Naval
Force, the Canal Defense Force, the Police Force, the Traffic
Department, the Department of Investigation, and the Immigration
Department.4
In addition to having the capability to control the populace,
the PDF was also able to conduct sabotage and stand-off attacks
against the Canal and U.S. military installations (such as Quarry
Heights, Fort Clayton, Howard Air Force Base, Albrook Air Force
Base, and the U.S. Naval Station at Rodman). Confronted by a more
powerful intervention force, the PDF planned to retreat into the
mountains and jungles of the interior and conduct prolonged
guerrilla warfare. At the time of the U.S. intervention, the PDF
contained 19 companies and six platoons, numbering some 8,000 men,
at least 3,500 of whom were well trained and equipped for combat.
Among the major items in their inventory were 29 armored personnel
carriers, 12 patrol craft, and 28 light transport aircraft.5
During 1988 and
1989, after the termination of security assistance and the
imposition of sanctions by the United States, Noriega turned to
Cuba, Nicaragua, and Libya for economic and military assistance.
Cuba and Nicaragua funneled Communist-bloc weapons and instructors
to Noriega and helped develop civilian defense committees (i.e.,
“Dignity Battalions”) for intelligence collection and
population control. Libya contributed $20 million in 1989 in
return for permission to use Panama as a base to coordinate
terrorist and insurgent groups activities throughout Latin
America.6
Although the PDF
was occupied heavily with maintaining civil order and responding
to U.S. military efforts to throw it off balance, it continued to
function as a police force. By December 1989 the PDF had been on
high alert for an extended period. Panama was “not a country
with an army, but an army with a country.”7
The PDF as an
Institution. The PDF was clearly understood to be corrupt.
Many of its officers and enlisted personnel were involved in
outside business activities, legal and illegal, including drug
trafficking. Getting a “turn at the trough” was a method
of reward and control. (The PDF itself was a “fee for service”
organization. Low pay was supplemented by these rewards.) Along
with a reputation for general ruthlessness, the PDF was regarded
as an organization that could “get things done, when
appropriately motivated,” whereas the relatively inefficient
civilian bureaucracy could not. This gave Noriega a certain
leverage vis-a-vis the U.S. military. The PDF was viewed by many
in the lower strata of society as the organization that looked
after their welfare and could provide meaningful upward social
mobility. Additionally, the business community in general worked
accommodations with it, and some prominent business leaders had
relatives who became PDF officers.8
Condition of
the Judicial and Prison Systems. The legal, judicial, and
penal systems during the Noriega regime were badly corrupted.
Prisoners might languish in jail for months and sometimes
literally 3, 4, or 5 years without even a hearing. Jails were
crowded, unsanitary, and violent. Any amenities had to be provided
by the prisoner’s family or friends. The legal system dispensed
political control rather than justice. The impact upon the
individual depended entirely on the nature of the relationship
with Noriega and the PDF.9
Planning and
Resources
The “Noriega
crisis” extended from June 1987, when Noriega was implicated in
the murder of prominent Panamanian politician Hugo Spadafora,10
until the implementation of Just Cause in December 1989 and
spanned portions of two U.S. administrations. Several key players
changed with the advent of the Bush administration, as did the
Chairmanship of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in September 1989. Many
players were also preoccupied by their involvement in the Central
American conflicts and the Iran-Contra investigations, and there
were different views and objectives being pursued by different
agencies. Consequently, from the perspective of those in the
field, the planning process had the appearance of being driven by
political circumstances “inside the beltway” rather than a
clear set of objectives.
Although there was
early agreement (summer 1987) that Noriega had to go, there was
considerable disagreement about how to depose him. Any lingering
doubt about Noriega staying in power was dispelled in February
1988 when he was indicted by the U.S. Justice Department on drug
trafficking charges. Any hope that the opposition-instigated
“civil crusade” could get rid of Noriega was dispelled on
February 25 when President Eric Arturo Delvalle attempted to
publicly fire Noriega. In response, Noriega named Solis Palma as
Delvalle’s successor. The “civil crusade” lacked strong U.S.
support and did nothing in response to these events. The U.S.
Government continued to recognize Delvalle as the President of
Panama and granted him safe haven in the United States, along with
a steady flow of political refugees.
In March 1988, a
coup attempt gave hope that the PDF could jettison Noriega while
preserving itself as an institution. Throughout the crisis there
were varying degrees of pressure from some quarters for the United
States to take military action. This was resisted by the U.S.
Department of Defense. Security assistance was cut off and
economic sanctions imposed. A variety of other schemes for ousting
Noriega were also examined by the U.S. interagency process.
Discussions with exile groups in 1988 and 1989, designed to give
the opposition encouragement, probably detracted from a focused
U.S. policy, since this raised unrealistic expectations that
Noriega could be removed without direct U.S. intervention. In
addition, the U.S. Presidential election campaign was at least
partly responsible for the apparent void in policy action during
the summer and fall 1988.
During 1987-88,
the Reagan administration’s Panama policy was also hampered by
persistent press leaks. The Bush administration handled this
problem after January 1989 by placing interagency access to Panama
policy matters on a highly restricted basis. While options
continued to be examined and economic sanctions remained in place,
one objective remained constant: to split Noriega from the PDF.
The administration continued to hope that he could be removed
without direct U.S. action. This effort intensified significantly
in 1989. The U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) forces began
aggressively exercising treaty rights of free passage through
Panama by such actions as ignoring road blocks, conducting
short-notice “Category Three” exercises and keeping maximum
pressure on the PDF, while at the same time complying with the
Panama Canal Treaties in order to maintain the legal high ground.
U.S. security forces in Panama were steadily increased, the number
of personnel living off base was reduced, and dependents were
encouraged to return to the United States.
Contingency
planning for military intervention began with a Joint Chiefs of
Staff (JCS) Planning Order dated February 28, 1988. Known
initially as Elaborate Maze, it included four major
components which could be implemented concurrently or in sequence:
Buildup of
U.S. combat forces
Noncombat
evacuation operations
Combat
operations
Restoration
of the Panamanian Government and state services in wake of
combat operations against the PDF.11
In response to the
planning order during the first half of 1988, General Fred F.
Woerner, Jr., U.S. Commander-in-Chief, Southern Command (USCINCSO)
forwarded his plan (code named Fissures) to the Joint
Chiefs. After receiving no response, Woerner updated Fissures
on his own initiative, calling it Fissures II. The update
called for coordinated interagency political-military efforts to
split Noriega from the PDF rank and file and the civilian
leadership of the regime, resulting in an internal resolution of
the Noriega problem. At the time Woerner forwarded Fissures II,
he stated it was an integrated, holistic plan that could not be
executed piecemeal.
General Woerner
was subsequently instructed to execute the plan in individual
pieces.12
Accordingly, Elaborate Maze/Fissures was changed to a
family of plans later called Prayerbook. Blue Spoon
became the plan for combat operations, and Krystal Ball,
completed in August 1988, became the plan to provide public
security and to restore civilian government in the event combat
operations became necessary. Woerner had been told by the
President that he did not want to intervene in Panama directly.
Combat and postcombat planning was thus considered more an
exercise, directed by prudence rather than an immediate
requirement. Thus Krystal Ball was never discussed with the
State Department. The individual plans comprising Prayerbook
were subsequently put “back on the shelf.”13
On March 3, 1989, Prayerbook
came off the shelf. The incident that precipitated this action was
the so-called “school bus crisis.” On that date, the PDF
seized 21 U.S. school buses with children of U.S. military and
civilian personnel aboard. U.S. Military Police reacted strongly
and the incident was defused within a few hours. However, the
incident had a profound effect on the resident U.S. community. A
“siege mentality” set in, and calls and letters flooded into
U.S. congressional offices asking that something be done to get
rid of the oppressive, and now threatening, Noriega regime.14
Krystal Ball, the civil-military operations part of Prayerbook,
was renamed Blind Logic and sent forward to JCS with
no recommendations for change.15
On May 10, 1989, Blue
Spoon, the plan for combat operations, became a more serious
proposition. The incident that precipitated this was the specter
of vice-presidential candidate Ford being brutally beaten by
Noriega hoodlums on live TV after the Panamanian elections of May
7. The outcome had gone against Noriega, and he had the results
nullified. The image of Ford being beaten and bloodied caused
revulsion against Noriega not only in Panama but throughout the
world.16
As part of Blue
Spoon, a Joint Task Force (JTF) under the XVIII Airborne Corps
was established. SOUTHCOM planners assumed that XVIII Airborne
Corps would operate in parallel with them and incorporate Blind
Logic, the civil affairs/public security plan, into their
operations planning. However, the XVIII Airborne Corps JTF did not
consider that there were any taskings for them in Blind Logic
and did not perceive Blind Logic as an approved plan.17
In fact, Blind Logic had never been approved by the Joint
Chiefs.
The Mission
Execution of Just
Cause
By the time
General Powell assumed Chairmanship of the JCS and General Maxwell
Thurman assumed command of SOUTHCOM at the end of September 1989,
a great deal of planning had already been done. On the basis of
this planning, President Bush set four objectives for Just
Cause on the eve of the invasion:
Protect
American lives
Ensure
implementation of the Panama Canal Treaties
Bring Noriega
to justice
Restore
Panamanian democracy.18
The maintenance of
public security was a secondary consideration for the overall
military operation. To accomplish the President’s objectives,
however, it would need to be an integral part of restoring
democracy. In fact, maintaining public security became a
key concern much earlier than anticipated as a result of
widespread looting shortly after the intervention took place.
A sense of urgency
came about on October 3, 1989. A coup attempt instigated by PDF
Major Moises Giroldi failed, and Giroldi was summarily executed.
Ironically, the strategy of trying to separate Noriega from the
PDF had worked, but the tactic failed. The United States did not
support the coup attempt, and Noriega arrested opposition elements
within the PDF. It then became obvious that U.S. military
intervention would be required, probably in response to some
“threshold event,” and revising Blue Spoon began in
earnest under General Thurman. This took place on two levels—at
SOUTHCOM and at the Joint Task Force (JTF)-South component of the
XVIII Airborne Corps.19
The new version of Blue Spoon was published at the end of
October 1989. Important changes included streamlining command and
control by putting all executing elements under JTF-South;
shifting combat focus from the center of Panama City to outlying
areas which left the U.S. troop presence in the city at a minimum;
ignoring the possibility of a public security vacuum and; and
placing responsibility for restoration of Panamanian Government
functions on U.S. Army South (USARSO) (Major General Cisneros).
This latter provision, however, was not properly coordinated.20
Leading up to Just
Cause, the SOUTHCOM J-5, BG Benard Gann, repeatedly tried to
present Blind Logic to General Thurman; however Thurman’s
total focus was on planning for hostilities, not posthostilities.21
On December 16,
1989, Lt. Paz was killed, and on 17 December President Bush gave
the order to execute Blue Spoon as Operation Just Cause.
On the evening of December 19, President Endara and his two vice
presidents were sworn into office, and early on December 20, U.S.
combat operations against the PDF were in full swing.
Although military
police were deployed with the 82nd Airborne Division at
the outset, planners for Blue Spoon/Just Cause had failed
to foresee the collapse of the PDF and the resultant need for
public security operations.22
The consequence was seen in looting that took place mostly in
Panama City and Colon23
where the destruction of the PDF left no local police force.24
The intervention did leave the interior of the country largely
unscathed, and the PDF continued to operate there and maintain law
and order.25
In the cities, rules of engagement in force for U.S. military
personnel were adequate to avoid a possible bloodbath, but U.S.
forces would not shoot looters.
Within the first 2
days of combat operations, looting broke out in the center of
Panama City and continued for the next three to four days.26
As a result of the urgent need to restore order and resume basic
government services, Blind Logic, the civil-military
operations plan, underwent a crash update, was approved by General
Thurman and sent to JCS for approval as Operation Promote
Liberty.27
On December 20,
Thurman directed BG Gann to move his entire organization to the
Panamanian Legislative Assembly building and assist the new Endara
government (which consisted of Endara and his two Vice
Presidents). The next day Promote Liberty was approved by
the JCS, and Gann became COMCMOTF (Commander, Civil-Military
Operations Task Force) and began to execute the plan for
restoration of civil government and public security to Panama. As
COMCMOTF, Gann was placed by Thurman under the operational control
of the U.S. Charge d’Affairs, John Bushnell.28
General Thurman also ordered that COMCMOTF personnel be combined
with the active duty 96th Civil Affairs (CA) Battalion,
expected to arrive on December 22, and 300 reservists who would
follow over the next 3 weeks.29
Because of a misunderstanding of the role that CA personnel were
to play, there was initially some resistance within the
interagency to this deployment. Some believed that CA personnel
would be viewed as “political commissars” directing the
Government of Panama instead of facilitating the restoration of
essential services.30
The looting and
chaos were ended when sufficient U.S. infantry and MP forces were
brought into the situation to discharge the public security
function without excessive use of force. From December 20-25,
COMCMOTF worked nonstop to establish security, restore services,
assist in the organization of the new government, and coordinate
activities of U.S. Government and nongovernment agencies.
Implementation of Promote
Liberty
The first phase of
Promote Liberty concentrated on public safety, health, and
population control measures. Later, the U.S. country team and the
new Panamanian Government took responsibility for civil control,
rebuilding commerce, winning the support of the people for
reforms, and restructuring the PDF into separate police, customs,
and defense organizations.31
Restoration of
civil government and public order did not get off to a good start.
The PDF had been destroyed, and there was no Panamanian entity to
replace it. Neither Washington nor JTF-South had contemplated the
disappearance of the PDF, counting instead upon a coup by the PDF.
Nor was the public chaos problem planned for; no military
consultations or coordination had taken place with appropriate
U.S. civilian agencies in this regard.32
Furthermore, Blind Logic planners did not address what kind
of security force would replace the PDF, since it was predicated
upon the assumption of a PDF coup ousting Noriega.33
In consultation with U.S. authorities, the Government of Panama
(GOP) had determined that a standing army was unnecessary.
Lacking other options, the GOP decided to replace it with a police
force made up of members of the defunct PDF, after screening out
undesirables.34
There were several
factors that contributed to this lack of focus on civil affairs.
Among these were disagreement between the Operations (J-3) and
Policy (J-5) SOUTHCOM; lack of an ambassador on scene (Ambassador
Dean Hinton arrived a couple of weeks later); lack of interagency
focus on this issue; and no political adviser on station at
SOUTHCOM. Nevertheless, General Thurman took full responsibility
for this oversight and in subsequent years cited it as the
greatest mistake in his military career.35
As of December 22,
four Brigade Task Forces from the 82nd Airborne had
been assigned to clear Panama City of hostiles (i.e., Dignity
Battalions), enforce a curfew, stop chaos and looting, and assume
temporary law enforcement functions. The 82nd Airborne
and 193rd Infantry Brigade elements in Panama City were
reinforced by additional MP companies. As the former cleared
designated zones, the MPs would take over, man the old PDF posts,
and undertake active patrols. The presence of the MPs and
withdrawal of combat forces had a calming effect upon the
population, law and order was restored, and relatively normal
activity resumed.36
It was not until
mid-January 1990 that General Thurman brought command and control
of all SOUTHCOM and JTF-SOUTH organizations involved with the
civil-military operation under the overall control of Military
Support Group—Panama (MSG). At this point the public security
mission was being performed on a more routine basis.37
To get the United
States out of an apparent “occupation” role, three conditions
had to be met. First, the Panamanian Government had to place
enough police on the streets to undertake joint patrols with U.S.
forces. This required a quick, ad hoc reconstitution of the old
PDF into a new Panamanian National Police (PNP). Second, some sort
of court/magistrate/judicial system had to be re-established
(e.g., the old night-court system). Finally, the penal system had
to be reopened. This required a massive reconstruction of old
jails and prisons after the looting and destruction in the
aftermath of Just Cause. This process took several weeks.38
Once the decision
had been made by General Thurman to implement Promote Liberty,
Major General Marc Cisneros, Commander ARSO, set up a U.S. Force
Liaison Group (USFLG) to advise, train, and equip the new police.39
A Military Support Group (MSG) became operational on January 17,
1990 and was given the mission of police training. Initially this
was conducted by the 18th Airborne Corps’ 16th
Military Police Brigade.40
A Judicial Liaison Group (JLG) was also established to
advise/assist the Panamanians. This was an ad hoc military
response on the ground to an unanticipated situation.
The initiatives
instigated by MG Cisneros using ARSO resources got the PNP on the
streets, the night-court system operating, and the jails and
prisons functioning.41
Situations not foreseen in Blind Logic or not provided for
in guidance from Washington were dealt with ad hoc.42
The establishment of the MSG was the logical extension of Blind
Logic and the ad hoc effort to institutionalize civil-military
operations in Panama prior to the official end of hostilities on
January 31, 1990.
Problems arose for
the MSG, however, with congressional passage of the “Urgent
Assistance Act for Panama of 1990” on February 14. In addition
to providing a much needed $43.7M in emergency assistance, it
reaffirmed the prohibition on police training by the U.S. military
contained in Section 660 of the Foreign Assistance Act. The Act
did, however, permit use of residual security assistance funds to
equip the police force. Negotiations with Congress during January
and early February for this legislation were unsuccessful in
producing a change in the Section 660 prohibition on police
training, in part because the Administration did not foresee the
importance of such a change, and in part because the need was not
apparent to Congress. However, they did provide authority and
limited funding for the Justice Department International Criminal
Investigative Training Assistance Program (ICITAP) to train
Panamanian police. In addressing the immediate security problem,
however, DOD found itself conducting at least what appeared to be
police training in violation of the law and took immediate steps
to remedy the situation.
|
Preceding
Page NEXT PAGE
Site
developed, owned and maintained by
William
H. Ormsbee, Jr.
2006
|
CHAPTER
2 of: Policing
the new world disorder : peace operations and public security, edited
by Robert B. Oakley, Michael J. Dziedzic, Eliot M. Goldberg, published by
NDU Press (National Defense University)
ABOUT
THE AUTHORS
DR.
ANTHONY WHITFORD GRAY, JR., has served on the faculty of the Military
Strategy and Logistics Department of the Industrial College of the Armed
Forces since 1993. Dr. Gray is a retired naval officer with extensive
experience in inter-American affairs. From 1983 to 1993 he served as
Deputy Director of Inter-American Affairs and subsequently as Director of
Humanitarian Assistance and Refugee Affairs in the Office of the
Undersecretary of Defense for Policy. He received his doctorate in
International Relations from the American University in 1982. His
publications include “The Evolution of U.S. Naval Policy in Latin
America” (doctoral dissertation, 1982), “Latin American Military
Institutions” (Hoover Institute, 1986-contributing author), and The
Big L: American Logistics in World War II (National Defense
University Press, 1997, contributing author).
DR.
MAXWELL G. MANWARING is a retired U.S. Army Colonel and is currently a
political-military affairs consultant based in Carlisle, Pennsylvania. He
has served in various positions, including the U.S. Army War College, the
U.S. Southern Command’s Small Wars Operations Research Directorate, the
Defense Intelligence Agency, and the Southern Command’s Directorate for
Plans, Policy, and Politico-Military Affairs. Dr. Manwaring is the author
of several articles on political-military affairs and is co-editor of the
prize-winning El Salvador at War: An Oral History (Washington, DC:
Government Printing Office, 1989) and Managing Contemporary
Conflict: Pillars of Success (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997).
END NOTES
FOR THIS CHAPTER NOT INCLUDED HEREIN.
|