| 
Christian Debatorial Works    |     home 
Humanism 
The term humanism over the past several centuries 
of Western thought has been used to express 
two different concepts. It is not too much to say 
that humanism in its original form created the intellectual 
foundation of the Renaissance. In modern 
times, humanism has most often come to mean 
an approach that characterizes all things in a 
human, rather than theistic, framework and emphasizes 
human rationality and experience in contrast 
to classic authority. It is arguable, however, 
that the adversarial relationship between theism 
and the human, including scientific knowledge 
and rationality, that is often imputed to modern 
humanism is unnecessarily simplistic, ignoring, for 
example, today’s Christian humanists. Moreover, it 
is possible to detect the evolution of a new, more 
integrative, humanism as a response to a world 
whose natural cycles and processes are increasingly 
dominated by the human. 
 
Humanism in its original sense meant simply 
the rediscovery and study of classic Greek and 
Latin language and texts, and the use of them to 
assess the work of doctrinal Scholastics and secondary 
commentaries of late Medieval Europe. Humanism 
during this time was more a cultural attitude 
and an academic program than a formal 
conceptual framework or a particular philosophy. 
Indeed, the first self-conscious humanist, the Italian 
poet Francis Petrarch (1304–1374), is notable 
for urging a new curricula based on original classical 
sources—the studia humanitatis, consisting of 
grammar, rhetoric, poetry, history, and moral philosophy. 
During this period, the term humanist 
had no ideological content and simply referred to 
anyone, layperson or Church official, who had a 
competence in classical Greek, Latin, and to a 
lesser extent Hebrew, and some familiarity with 
classical texts. 
Early humanism led to the recovery of the direct 
study of the Bible. Many early medieval 
Church figures such as Thomas Moore (1478–1535) 
and Desiderius Erasmus (1469–1536), and a number 
of reformers, strongly supported the humanist 
approach. In general, however, early humanism 
was stronger in Italy than in the more medieval 
north of Europe. Thus, Pope Nicholas V 
(1447–1455) is referred to by Bertrand Russell in A 
History of Western Philosophy (1945) as “the first 
humanist Pope” (p. 498). Nicholas’s apostolic secretary 
was the epicurean humanist Lorenzo Valla 
(1407–1457). Reflecting their culture, the vast majority 
of humanists were practicing Christians, although 
they tended to react against the medieval 
Scholastic veneration of authority. Valla, for example, 
wrote a long treatise somewhat inelegantly titled 
Restructuring of All Dialectic with the Foundations 
of the Whole of Philosophy, in which he 
purported to demonstrate the invalidity of Aristotelian 
logic, a foundation of Scholasticism. 
 
As Western culture evolved, however, humanism 
inevitably began to challenge medieval worldviews 
in fundamental ways. Rather than the authority 
of Aristotle (384–322 B.C.E.), Augustine of 
Hippo (354–430), and Thomas Aquinas (c. 
1225–1274), humanists rediscovered and began to 
teach classical texts of all types. These not only 
greatly broadened the knowledge base available to 
scholars and the educated, but stimulated both increased 
curiosity about the world in general and a 
different concept of validity. During the early medieval 
period, reference to accepted authority was 
the highest demonstration of truth; humanism over 
time led to increased reference to the physical 
world as the ultimate source of validity in argument. 
The authority of Galen (c. 130–201 C.E.) in 
medicine or Aristotle in physics was increasingly 
challenged by data and argument derived not from 
accepted texts but from observation of the world 
itself. In doing so, humanism created the foundations 
for the profound ontological shift from the 
otherworldliness of medieval faith to scientific 
knowledge that characterized the Enlightenment 
and, subsequently, modernity. 
 
The Enlightenment is often characterized as a 
conflict between faith and reason, but that is misleading. 
Major Enlightenment figures, including on 
the nascent rationalist side Francis Bacon 
(1561–1626) and, later, Isaac Newton (1642–1727), 
clearly viewed their scientific work as aligned with 
the Christian faith, even mandated by it. On the literary 
side, the Romantic project was seen by many 
of its leading figures as an effort to modernize and 
humanize Christian theology in light of Enlightenment 
science, which had come to represent an independent 
and in some ways equally powerful ontology. 
Thus, the poet John Keats (1795–1821) saw 
his goal as creating “a system of Salvation which 
does not affront our reason and humanity” (quoted 
in Abrams, p. 33), a goal that can be broadly attributed 
to the Romantic movement in general. 
 
Attitudes toward modern humanism mirror the 
distortions of the Enlightenment characterization. 
In particular, the attacks by Christian fundamentalists 
on “secular humanism” in the United States, especially 
regarding the teaching of evolution, have 
created an impression that humanism is necessarily 
opposed to religion. Secular humanism, a tradition 
flowing from eighteenth-century Enlightenment 
rationalism and subsequent freethinking 
movements, is indeed characterized by a 
Promethean suspicion of theism and religious authority, 
and a belief that humans are the measure 
of all things; it is, however, but one branch of the 
humanist project. Modern humanists fall into many 
categories, including literary humanism, characterized 
by a devotion to the humanities; cultural 
humanism, the rational, empirical tradition derived 
from ancient Greece and Rome that forms the basis 
of modern Western societies; and philosophic humanism, 
systems of thought focused on human 
needs and realities. 
 
Of particular interest, however, are the schools 
of humanism that explicitly integrate religious and 
scientific worldviews. Thus, Christian humanism, 
the philosophy that posits the self-fulfillment of humans 
within the framework of Christian principles 
and beliefs, has evolved from Moore and Erasmus 
through elements of the Anglican and German 
pietist traditions and philosophers such as Immanuel 
Kant (1724–1804). It is represented by 
modern theologians such as Jacques Maritain, 
Hans Kung, Paul Tillich, and James Luther Adams. 
More explicitly, the Unitarian Universalist tradition 
includes among its seven Principles three that are 
obviously humanist; they affirm (1) the “inherent 
worth and dignity of every person,” (2) justice, “equity 
and compassion in human relations,” and (3) 
a “free and responsible search for truth and meaning.” 
The Unitarian Universalists also identify as 
among the sources of their tradition humanist 
“teachings which counsel us to heed the guidance 
of reason and the results of science, and warn us 
against idolatries of the mind and spirit.” 
This integration of faith and rationality will become 
increasingly important in light of the recognition 
that, as a result of the Industrial Revolution, 
population and economic growth, and globalization, 
the dynamics of most major natural systems 
are increasingly influenced by human activity. 
Since this results in a world where teleologies and 
belief systems are increasingly reified in natural 
systems through intentional human activity, a rational 
humanistic understanding, combined with 
the religious faith that is central to the human experience— 
perhaps an “Earth systems” humanism— 
may well be a future evolutionary path of 
humanism. |